1.5-m - November 2001

Data reduction for the 1.5m
CTIO 1.5m optical data (November 2001)

 

f/13.5 binned 2x2

We had three nights with the 1.5m in November 2001 to provide local standards for the highz supernova fields. Kevin and Pablo did the observing. A summary of the data reduction can be found here.

The photometric calibration files can be found here for the filters: bvriu.clb , riv.clb , and rz.clb

There were significant problems with the data. The setup had a 2 1/16" diaphragm in the upper filter bolt. The flats and skies were clearly vignetted. A quick calculation shows that this is the wrong diaphragm.

Here is an image of the sky flat in R taken on 9/10 Nov. Note the clear falloff of the light near the edges. From this image, we decided to extract the middle 750 pixels (binned 2x2, so we are really taking the middel 1500 physical pixels.

 

sflat

 

Here is an image of the dome flat divided by the sky flat across the full chip. The vignetting is also clear in this image.

dflat_div_sflat

 

The "z" images showed fringing. Here is a typical z frame.

fringe

 

and here is the same image after defringing. The fringe frame was made by a simple median of all the long z exposures.

no fringe

 

I averaged all the residuals for the 3 nights to look for trends. There were a few trends that are worrisome.

The next plot shows the residuals (O-C) of the Landolt standards. plotted against log10(counts). There is a small but real trend from 10**4 to 10*6 counts of about 0.015mag over this range. 

Residuals-counts

 

Doing the same plot against the library magnitude:

Residuals - magnitude

 

There was no obvious trend against x-direction, but in the y direction, one could see about a 0.02mag (full range) change in mag from the edge to center, in the sense that O was brighter than C:

 Residuals - y

These data, remember, are the central 1500 pixels. Evidently there is still a small amount of vignetting.
At this point, I am not going to take out the effect, but it looks real.

back to top