Mirror washing. Iris reflectometry and BRDF data before/after wash was respectively:
Thus a spectacular 11% net gain in reflectivity. Only about 1.5% was not recovered compared to the last washing results. It also shows a 2.2% reflectivity loss per month (averaged over the last 6 months), which is about 3.5 times higher than usual!
Mirror washing. Iris reflectometry and BRDF data before/after wash was respectively:
It was very successful, bringing the mirror back close to a fresh aluminium performance.
We used isopropyl alcohol at the end of the rinsing but this did leave a few ugly whitish marks that we could not recover with another soap wash. Rancourt explains (Optical Thin Films, User's handbook, McGraw Hill 1987) that the 'evaporation of the solvent on the surface beeing cleaned will reduce the temperature locally and may cause the moisture in the air to condense in the vicinity of the droplet, leaving a mark when water dries' (p175). This might be what happened. Since then, we do not use alcohol anymore in our washings... We also identified thousands of pinholes in the coating by shining light from underneath the mirror, sign that the mirror was dusty when last put in the coating chamber.
We washed M1. The following graph show reflectivity and scatter as we found the mirror after 10 months (without cleaning it at all), after a CO2 cleaning, and finally after washing. Last aluminizing data is also plotted for reference. Final state of the mirror is actually better than after aluminizing, a surprise also noticed by Giordano at the NTT using Collodion peeling films (Wilson R, Reflecting telescope optics II, A&A library 1999, p 444). All measurements made with the Minolta.
M1 reflectivity and scatter [3]
Between June 97 and June 99, M1 reflectivity as decreased by 7.8% per year at 400nm and 7.2 per year at 700nm, while scatter has increased by 3.8% per year at 400nm and 5.3% per year at 700nm. Between June 99 and April 00, M1 reflectivity and scatter have varied according to the same trend as the previous period, which is a monthly variation of: R-0.68% at 400nm and R-0.73% at 700nm, SC+0.36% at 400nm and SC+0.52% at 700nm. In theory, scattered light dependence on wavelength is given by TIS=(4.pi.d/l)^2 where TIS is the total integrated scatter measured in 2pi str, d is the roughness height and l is the wavelength. Therefore, scattered light should be lower in the nearIR than in the blue. Particle size might modify that law if they are about the size of the wavelength.
We aluminized both mirrors. Last time was: 6June97 for M1 and 9Dic97 for M2. See the following plots. In the text below, we give the average number (2 points sampled each time) at 550nm for a rapid evaluation of, respectively, the reflectivity and the scattered light measured with the Minolta.
Finally, we aluminized (91.9% and 1.10%).
M1 reflectivity [4] and M1 scattering [5].
From the reflectivity of fresh aluminizing (91.9%) and after CO2 cleaning (86.7%), we can estimate the monthly loss if the mirror had been regularly CO2 cleaned: (91.9-86.7) / 24 = 0.22% which is in agreement with the data measured at the 1.5m with regular cleaning.
We conclude that CO2 cleaning slows the natural dust deposition process by a factor of about 3.M2 reflectivity [6] and M2 scattering [7]
Reflectometry and BRDF at the Schmidt: measured in April 01
Last update: 16 April 01
Reflectometry and BRDF data with Iris:
This corresponds to a 1.1% reflectivity loss per month at 530nm (average over 5 months), about twice higher than usual.
Regular washing in September improved reflectivity by 8.5% in average. Reflectometry and BRDF data with Iris (before/after wash respectively):
These numbers are actually close (some are even slightly higher!) than what is quoted in the litterature for a new coating. In October, rain leaked through the dome shutter and contaminated M1 (lots of long ugly white stripes across the mirror): in the bad areas (about 20% of the mirror), about 6% loss was measured but it was well recovered with washing in November (only about 1.8% less compared to previous wash). The reflectivity and BRDF improved to:
Mirror washed on the 21st, see the plots of reflectivity and scattering [9] (the numbers after the last aluminizing are also plotted for reference). All data with the Minolta.
See the plots of reflectivity [10] and scattering [11] for that period (data with the Minolta).
Reflectivity decreases in average by 2.5% per year and scatter increases by 2.0% per year. There seems to be a seasonal trend as the slopes are much higher in 'summer' (October to April) when the site humidity is higher (32-55%), which makes the dust stick more easily onto the glass: summer slope for R and SC is about 0.63% per month, whereas it is only about 0.05% per month in 'winter' (May to September, RH is 12-32%).
Numerical data: in parenthesis (last column) is the number of points sampled on the mirror for each result. Each point on the mirror is sampled 3 times (averaged by the reflectometer). On some dates (like 10Jan98), we also indicate the variations (+/-) in the data. For the first row, replace "before/after CO2 cleaning" by "before/after Al". The case "before Al" means the mirror was CO2 dusted and measured just before realuminizing.
DATE |
% Reflectivity before CO2 cleaning |
% Reflectivity after CO2 cleaning |
% Scattering before CO2 cleaning |
% Scattering after CO2 cleaning |
Elapsed time (weeks) between new Al and CO2 |
||||
400nm | 700nm | 400nm | 700nm | 400nm | 700nm | 400nm | 700nm | ||
2-Sep-98 +/- |
87.42 0.47 |
84.22 0.13 |
93.46 0.74 |
89.11 0.50 |
4.49 0.71 |
4.40 0.39 |
1.47 1.41 |
0.77 0.71 |
new aluminium (3) |
10-Sep-98 | 95.16 | 90.1 | 94.53 | 89.75 | 0.61 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.35 | 1 (1) |
14-Oct-98 | 94.1 | 88.89 | 95.23 | 90.05 | 1.06 | 0.80 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 6 (2) |
13-Nov-98 | no data | 10 (0) | |||||||
11-Dec-98 | 91.59 | 87.23 | 93.58 | 89.08 | 1.95 | 1.61 | 1.51 | 1.18 | 14 (4) |
10-Jan-99 +/- |
91.62 1.78 |
86.91 0.83 |
93.69 0.9 |
88.76 0.78 |
1.77 0.01 |
1.98 0.04 |
1.41 0.16 |
1.32 0.22 |
18 (4) |
19-Feb-99 | 91.18 | 86.46 | 92.24 | 87.58 | 3.34 | 3.34 | 3.12 | 2.55 | 23 (3) |
19-Mar-99 | 92.34 | 87.46 | 92.59 | 88.06 | 2.61 | 2.56 | 2.69 | 2.11 | 27 (3) |
17-Apr-99 | 92.27 | 87.55 | 92.63 | 87.93 | 2.94 | 2.45 | 2.91 | 2.24 | 31 (3) |
16-May-99 | 92.18 | 87.64 | 92.43 | 87.89 | 2.75 | 2.38 | 2.69 | 2.18 | 35 (3) |
13-Jun-99 | 92.58 | 87.87 | 92.75 | 88.12 | 2.54 | 2.25 | 2.44 | 2.02 | 39 (3) |
10-Jul-99 | 91.59 | 87.7 | 91.61 | 87.91 | 2.75 | 2.39 | 2.66 | 2.16 | 43 (3) |
8-Aug-99 | 91.44 | 87.61 | 91.78 | 87.91 | 2.57 | 2.3 | 2.38 | 2.01 | 47 (3) |
4-Sept-99 | 91.45 | 87.21 | 92.35 | 87.84 | 2.81 | 2.42 | 2.55 | 2.09 | 51 (3) |
3-Oct-99 | 91.31 | 86.96 | 91.56 | 87.06 | 3.21 | 2.61 | 3.09 | 2.55 | 55 (3) |
30-Oct-99 | 90.96 | 86.87 | 91.19 | 87.3 | 3.24 | 2.80 | 3.25 | 2.45 | 59 (3) |
29-Nov-99 | 91.08 | 86.7 | 3.64 | 3.28 | 63(3) no cleaning | ||||
23-Dec-99 | 90.52 | 86.39 | 91.84 | 87.42 | 4.04 | 3.48 | 3.62 | 2.75 | 67 (3) |
22-Jan-00 | 71 no data taken | ||||||||
6-Feb-00 | 87.88 | 84.63 | 88.98 | 85.63 | 5.57 | 4.86 | 5.14 | 4.05 | 73 (3) |
17-Mar-00 | 87.34 | 87.34 | 88.1 | 85.18 | 5.55 | 5.03 | 5.35 | 4.25 | 78 (3) |
21-Mar-00 | 88.3 | 84.69 | 92.66 | 89.03 | 5.62 | 4.68 | 2.20 | 1.09 | 78(3) WASH |
See the efficiency plots of the CO2 cleaning: reflectivity [12] and scattererometry [13]. Average gain per cleaning session is R+0.70% and SC-0.30% in the visible.
Aluminizing, see the plot [14] of reflectivity and scattering before and after aluminizing (last one was in Apr 97).
Aluminized together on August 26, 1999. Measurements with the Minolta.
See the f/13.5 [15] mirror reflectometry and scatterometry.
See the f/7.5 [16] mirror reflectometry and scatterometry.
Last update: 18 April 01
[As part of the move to the NOIRLab web site, this page is not to be migrated and its contents have been archived in https://www.ctio.noao.edu/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=1404 [18]]
A recent summary of reflectometry data
Measurements of the reflectivity and total integrated scattering of the Blanco primary mirror (M1) and f/8 secondary mirror (M2) are periodically taken and archived to monitor the quality of the telescopes reflecting surfaces. Currently, measurements are taken with an Iris 908RS scattero-reflectometer during mirror washings (every few months) and aluminizations (less often).
Here is the most recent memo by Daniel Holck on the reflectivity data for the Blanco Telescope:
Blanco Reflectance Log: March-November 2011 [19]
Recent measurements (2011) for the Blanco primary mirror M1 show that the reflectivity in the blue (470-530nm) is 92% after aluminization, and slightly lower at redder wavelengths (90% @ 650nm, 88% @ 880nm). Reflectivity tends to decrease ~0.3-0.6% per month afterwards, depending on wavelength. Recent mirror washings appear to increase the blue reflectivity ~0.3-1.0%. The reflectivity of the Blanco f/8 secondary mirror M2 is measured less often, but given its position and baffling, it is much more protected from dust and less variation has been measured. M2 was aluminized in 2001, and recent washings took place in 2007 and 2010. The M2 mirror's reflectivity is typically ~90% in the blue optical (470-530nm) after a wash.
What follows are archival measurements of the Blanco mirrors for the period 1998-2010, and associated documents and figures.
The measurements were interrupted between November 00 and February 01. Monthly variation rates (over the last 8 months) are: R -0.34% and BRDF(-15) +0.24%. The scatter in the reflectometry plot since February is not well understood, although it might be partly due to the summer seasonal effect (high humidity and thus unstable measuring conditions?).
FEBRUARY 01:
in-situ washing. Iris reflectometry and BRDF data before/after wash was respectively:
* 89.6/93.5% (470nm), 89.6/93.6% (530nm), 86.3/89.8% (650nm), 85.1/89.0% (800nm)
* 2.66/0.21% (+20deg), 2.36/0.33% (-15deg), 0.47/0.24% (-45deg)
Aluminizing. Iris Reflectometry and BRDF data before/after the coating was respectively:
* 70.6/92.6% (470nm), 71.7/93.0% (530nm), 70.1/89.3% (650nm), 72.2/88.0% (800nm)
* 11.4/0.13% (+20deg), 13.1/0.25% (-15deg), 1.02/0.03% (-45deg)
Before the coating process started, we noticed a strong reflectivity discrepancy between the Minolta and Iris measurements, of the order of 10% (Iris: 71.7% vs. Minolta: 81.5% at 530nm), which becomes much less for the fresh Aluminium (Iris: 93.0% vs. Minolta: 93.6%).
Regular CO2 cleaning (twice per month)
All data taken with the Minolta. See the plots corresponding to the entire period: reflectivity [22] and scattering [23].
Yearly variation rates are R -2.5% and SC +2.0%, in agreement with what is measured at the 1.5m. A seasonal trend seems to show up, as is the case for the 1.5m.
Below is a table of the numerical data. In parenthesis (last column) is the number of points sampled on the mirror for each result. Each point on the mirror is sampled 3 times (averaged by the reflectometer). On some dates (like 23Dec98), we also indicate the variations (+/-) in the data. For the first row, replace "before/after CO2 cleaning" by "before/after Al". The case "before Al" means the mirror was CO2 cleaned and measured just before realuminizing.
From 17 April 99 to August 00, we sampled the same 3 points marked on the mirror (the sampling points were random up to that date). On 18 Sept 99, we changed the edge sampling point.
Date | % Reflectivity before CO2 cleaning |
% Reflectivity after CO2 cleaning |
% Scattering before CO2 cleaning |
% Scattering after CO2 cleaning |
Elapsed time (week) between new Al and CO2 |
||||
400nm | 700nm | 400nm | 700nm | 400nm | 700nm | 400nm | 700nm | ||
7-Aug-98 | 81.68 | 78.56 | 93.88 | 89.6 | 8.32 | 8.75 | 0.58 | 0.33 | new aluminium |
25-Aug-98 | 92.6 | 88.83 | 92.82 | 89.16 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.55 | 2 (1) |
10-Sep-98 | 91.99 | 88.55 | 92.88 | 89.05 | 0.91 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.56 | 4 (1) |
30-Sep-98 | 92.33 | 88.53 | 92.34 | 88.64 | 1.12 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.73 | 7 (1) |
14-Oct-98 | 93.59 | 88.71 | 93.83 | 88.68 | 0.93 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 9 (1) |
29-Oct-98 | 91.81 | 88.66 | 90.97 | 88.22 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.94 | 0.70 | 11 (1) |
12-Nov-98 | 90.96 | 88.06 | 90.45 | 87.96 | 1.09 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 0.83 | 12 (1) |
26-Nov-98 | 91.19 | 87.75 | 90.4 | 87.31 | 1.40 | 1.21 | 1.55 | 1.07 | 15 (2) |
12-Dic-98 | 90.87 | 87.45 | 91.28 | 87.87 | 1.94 | 1.45 | 1.1 | 0.92 | 17 (3) |
23-Dic-98 +/- |
92.57 0.51 |
88.33 0.30 |
92.69 0.78 |
88.51 0.39 |
1.30 0.19 |
1.19 0.09 |
1.20 0.25 |
1.00 0.21 |
19 (4) |
10-Jan-99 +/- |
90.78 1.83 |
87.2 1.19 |
91.58 1.02 |
87.96 0.40 |
1.83 0.60 |
1.56 0.19 |
1.56 0.20 |
1.29 0.14 |
21 (4) |
23-Jan-99 | 90.8 | 87.03 | 90.95 | 87.55 | 2.29 | 2.03 | 2.04 | 1.52 | 23 (3) |
5-Feb-99 | 91.11 | 87.59 | 91.41 | 87.76 | 1.92 | 1.64 | 2.02 | 1.55 | 25 (3) |
19-Feb-99 | 89.94 | 86.42 | 90.3 | 86.67 | 2.86 | 2.59 | 2.68 | 2.35 | 27 (3) |
6-Mar-99 | 89.51 | 86.32 | 89.82 | 86.61 | 2.98 | 2.42 | 3.18 | 2.45 | 29 (3) |
19-Mar-99 | 90.25 | 86.94 | 90.48 | 87.04 | 2.75 | 2.19 | 2.68 | 2.12 | 31 (3) |
3-April-99 +/- |
89.62 1.03 |
86.23 0.45 |
90.31 0.77 |
86.51 0.23 |
3.62 0.81 |
2.9 0.39 |
3.15 0.07 |
2.77 0.10 |
33 (3) |
17-April-99 | 90.4 | 86.93 | 90.55 | 87.14 | 2.88 | 2.25 | 2.75 | 2.00 | 35 (3) |
1-May-99 | 89.85 | 87.07 | 88.88 | 85.82 | 2.6 | 2.02 | 2.82 | 2.09 | 37 (3) |
15-May-99 | 89.79 | 86.85 | 89.81 | 86.97 | 2.95 | 2.15 | 2.87 | 2.12 | 39 (3) |
30-May-99 | 89.45 | 86.69 | 89.75 | 86.92 | 2.94 | 2.2 | 2.86 | 2.06 | 41 (3) |
13-Jun-99 | 89.83 | 87.01 | 89.69 | 87.05 | 2.76 | 2.04 | 2.92 | 2.07 | 43 (2) |
10-Jul-99 | 89.7 | 86.78 | 89.47 | 87.14 | - | - | 2.81 | 1.99 | 47 (2) |
23-Jul-99 | 89.48 | 86.56 | 89.74 | 87.06 | 2.99 | 2.15 | 2.91 | 2.07 | 49 (2) |
8-Aug-99 | 88.35 | 86.55 | 88.51 | 86.62 | 3.0 | 2.17 | 3.02 | 2.14 | 51 (2) |
22-Aug-99 | 88.82 | 86.31 | 88.69 | 86.3 | 3.12 | 2.29 | 3.01 | 2.15 | 53 (2) |
4-Sep-99 | 89.3 | 86.4 | 87.89 | 85.31 | 3.15 | 2.25 | 3.68 | 2.45 | 55 (2) |
18-Sep-99 | 89.6 | 86.37 | 89.2 | 86.24 | 2.95 | 2.32 | 3.15 | 2.38 | 57 (3) |
3-Oct-99 | 88.56 | 85.61 | 88.87 | 86.02 | 3.21 | 2.47 | 3.36 | 2.43 | 59 (3) |
15-Oct-99 | 89.9 | 87.01 | 89.79 | 86.89 | 2.83 | 2.1 | 3.13 | 2.29 | 61 (3) |
30-Oct-99 | 88.91 | 86.09 | 89.23 | 86.42 | 3.22 | 2.46 | 3.24 | 2.35 | 63 (3) |
12-Nov-99 | 88.72 | 85.97 | 88.77 | 86.08 | 3.38 | 2.57 | 3.33 | 2.47 | 65 (3) |
29-Nov-99 | 87.66 | 85.26 | 87.85 | 85.36 | 4.36 | 3.35 | 4.27 | 3.21 | 67 (3) |
10-Dec-99 | 87.83 | 85.22 | 87.48 | 85.2 | 4.11 | 3.23 | 4.24 | 3.11 | 69 (3) |
23-Dec-99 | 87.67 | 85.06 | 88.12 | 85.43 | 4.82 | 3.64 | 4.42 | 3.31 | 71 (3) |
7-Jan-00 | 85.67 | 83.43 | 86.32 | 83.94 | no cleaning (interp) |
||||
22-Jan-00 | 83.67 | 81.8 | 84.51 | 82.44 | 7.43 | 6.01 | 7.22 | 5.77 | 75 (3) |
5-Feb-00 | 83.49 | 81.88 | 84.04 | 82.31 | 7.50 | 5.95 | 7.29 | 5.67 | 77 (3) interpolated |
22-Feb-00 | 83.31 | 81.96 | 83.57 | 82.18 | 7.57 | 5.89 | 7.36 | 5.57 | 79 (3) interpolated |
3-Mar-00 | 83.12 | 82.06 | 83.1 | 82.04 | 7.64 | 5.82 | 7.44 | 5.48 | 81 (3) |
17-Mar-00 | 82.36 | 81.18 | 82.95 | 81.92 | 8.48 | 6.56 | 8.05 | 5.93 | 83 (2) |
31-Mar-00 | 83.04 | 81.6 | 83.2 | 81.73 | 7.93 | 5.96 | 8.02 | 6.05 | 85 (3) |
13-Apr-00 | 82.39 | 80.99 | 82.27 | 81.02 | 8.51 | 6.37 | 8.60 | 6.34 | 87 (3) |
30-Apr-00 | 82.91 | 81.88 | 83.03 | 82.13 | 8.34 | 5.95 | 8.13 | 5.75 | 89 (3) |
10-May-00 | 81.02 | 79.8 | 81.11 | 80.67 | 10.18 | 7.99 | 9.68 | 7.03 | 90 (2) |
27-May-00 | 82.82 | 81.87 | 82.76 | 81.89 | 8.02 | 5.93 | 7.71 | 5.70 | 91 (3) |
11-June-00 | 82.22 | 81.04 | 81.98 | 81.35 | 8.81 | 6.79 | 8.85 | 6.45 | 93 (3) |
23-June-00 | No cleaning | ||||||||
6-July-00 | 81.88 | 81.26 | 81.82 | 81.17 | 8.68 | 6.28 | 8.86 | 6.44 | 97 (3) |
22-July-00 | 80.76 | 80.58 | 82.31 | 81.41 | 9.39 | 6.73 | 8.24 | 6.16 | 99 (3) |
22-Ago-00 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 99 (3) |
Here are efficiency plots of the CO2 cleaning: reflectivity [24] and scattererometry [25]. Average gain per cleaning session is R+0.36% and SC-0.28% in the visible.
See the plots for before washing [26] and after realuminizing [27] (note: the mirror had not been cleaned at all since early 1997). Data with the Minolta.
# F/8 M2: last aluminized on 31 January 01. Iris reflectometry and BRDF data before/after coating was respectively:
* 80.7/90.3% (470nm), 81.6/90.5% (530nm), 80.8/88.2% (650nm), 80.1/85.5% (800nm)
* 6.9/0.2% (+20deg), 6.3/0.2% (-15deg), 0.2/0.03% (-45deg)
Blanco R&S follow up [28]
Blanco Follow up January 2010 [29]
Last update: 23 November 2011 by Eric Mamajek
Instrucciones para el uso del IRIS 908RS
Max Boccas, 20 Agosto 2000
Reflectivity measurements are made with 4 leds at 470, 530, 650 and 880nm at 45deg incident angle (the data is then corrected to 0deg with the Fresnel laws). The scatter is measured through the BRDF (Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function) and measured with a laser diode at 670nm (this is sensitive to polarization). The BRDF is the scattered power per unit solid angle normalized by the incident power and the cosine of the scatter angle. The BRDF is measured at 3 angles from the normal (0, 30 and 65deg) and for the incident angle 45deg. The log records BRDF(65,45) noted '+20deg', BRDF(35,45) noted '-15deg' and BRDF(0,45) noted '-45deg'. Micro-roughness of the surface is calculated from the scatter.
1. Poner la maleta del Iris a temperatura ambiente unos 30min antes de la medición
(dejar maleta abierta para estabilizar más rapido aún).
2. Encender el aparato en ON. Si no muestra 'Low Battery', seguir asi.
Sino, enchufar el cable del transformador y conectar al 110V (el Iris debe estar ON primero sino se pondrá en modo Carga de bateria).
3. CALIBRAR
3.1. Calibrar la reflectividad
3.2. Calibrar el Scatter
4. PRE-MEDICIONES
Limpiar 3 pads del Iris con alcohol y llevar Iris al espejo.
4.1 Scatter
4.2. Reflectividad
5. Limpiar espejo con CO2 (dejar Iris protegido)
6. POST-MEDICIONES
7. Apagar y guardar el Iris. Tener mucho cuidado con la limpieza de los gauges y el Iris mismo.
8. Descarga de la data al PC. Conectar el Iris a la puerta serial del PC. Lanzar programa Hyperterminal con el icono Iris908rs. Seleccionar Transfer/Capture_Text y el file C:/max/iris/capture.txt
Apoyar en F4 y START en el iris. Aparecerá la data en la ventana del PC. Cuando termina cerrar el Hyperterminal y apagar el Iris.
The Minolta uses a white shiny surface as calibration gauge and is more oriented toward colorimetry analysis. The absolute calibration of our device is wrong (Al reflectivity in the blue has a peculiar increasing slope and sometimes approaches 96%!) so only relative measurements (loss and gain) are meaningful. On the contrary, the Iris uses both a reflection gauge (a polished and protected aluminized mirror) and a scatter gauge (a ground glass) that are precisely calibrated in factory, thus providing absolute numbers that can be directly compared with the theorical curves presented. Unfortunately, our experience trying to calibrate the Minolta versus the Iris is not very coherent as we see different behaviours with different coatings: in general the Minolta reflectometry data seems to be overestimated by about 3.7% (470nm), 3.1% (530nm) and 5.0% (650nm) for coatings made at the 4m chamber, and by 1.3% (470nm), 1.0% (530nm) and 3.1% (650nm) for coatings made at the 1.5m chamber (all offset are within +/-0.5%).
Minolta CM-2002 spectrophotometer
Characteristics: solid angle of the measurement beam: 7.4deg ; incidence angle of measurement: 8deg ; measured area: diameter 8mm
In mode SCE (Specular Component Excluded), an internal light trap opens up and let the specular reflection of the source lamp onto the sample surface be captured and eliminated from the measurement. Only scattered light from the sample surface is measured. The Total Integrated Scatter (TIS) is measured and relates to the micro-roughness of the surface as: In mode SCI (Specular Component Included), the light trap is closed, therefore the source light bounces off it and gets to the sensor: the combination of reflected and scattered lights are measured. Specular reflected light will then come from the calculation of the difference SCI-SCE.
Procedure for internal memory data transfer to PC; 11/08/98 (M. Boccas)
1. PC and Spectr OFF: connect the RS232 cable to Spectr and COM port of PC
2. Turn ON PC and Spectr.
3. On Spectr:
- press DEL and MENU to go to menu
- press AVG to select DATA OUT
- press the DOWN KEY to enter data out menu
- press AVG to select SETUP and enter with DOWN KEY
- Select 9600 bauds, Even, 7 bits/char, 1 stop bit, Auto out Off, output to PC
- press MENU, press AVG to select REMOTE, enter with DOWN KEY
- the Spectr shows /REMOTE/ and is ready for data transfer
4. On PC (Windows):
-enter Start/Programs/ Accessories/Hyperterminal/Hyperterminal
- give name to your emulator/hyperterminal (for example "reflectometer")
- select the COM port used
- enter the same settings as in the Spectr (9600, even, 7, 1) and NONE for Flow control
- enter the FILE menu, choose Properties, then Settings, then Ascii setup, select "Append line" in the Ascii receiving section (so you can see all the commands and received data on different lines of your emulator)
- in the menu TRANSFER, start the Capture Text option
- Define a capture file (create a dummy one before) or use the default one proposed
NOW
- type DQR then Return to see the number of data sets in the Spectr memory card
- type SDR then Return
- type the number returned by DQR then Return
(see list of commands p86 Minolta manual)
- the Spectr display will show /OUTPUT/ during transfer
(Press DEL on Spectr anytime to interrupt transfer)
- the transfer ends with a E in the hyperterminal window
- stop the Capture in the TRANSFER menu
- put the data in Excell for plotting
Note: the SDR command downloads all the files in the memory card up to the number specified. If you haven't erased the memory card since last measurements, you will need to select only the wanted last files in Excell.
Total Integrated Scatter:
In theory, scattered light dependence on wavelength is given by:
TIS=(4.pi.d/l)^2
where TIS is the total integrated scatter measured in 2pi str, d is the roughness height and l is the wavelength. Therefore, scattered light should be lower in the nearIR than in the blue. Particle size might modify that law if they are about the size of the wavelength.
Since the beginning of the year 2000, we have implemented a program of regular washing (every 6 months) of the primary mirrors of the 4.0-m, 1.5-m and 0.9-m telescopes. The results are so good that we are now planning to aluminize these mirrors every 4 years only (instead of every 2 years up to now). The 4.0-m M1 is washed in-situ with a system of inflatable seals. We are able to peform the operation in a minimum amount of time (typically 2-3 hours at the 4.0-m) without specific engineering time scheduled. Since August 2000, we are also using an IRIS 908RS device to measure scattered and reflected light from the mirrors (the IRIS replaces the Minolta instrument). In August 2000, we have also installed a grounding cable for the 4m M1 coating in the hope to minimize the accumulation of dust by electrostatic attraction.
Besides, we perform fortnightly C02 snow cleaning of the 4.0-m and 1.5-m primary mirrors. The secondary mirrors keep clean much longer and are typically cleaned with CO2 twice per year.
This operation is normally conducted every 2 years in average during the winter shut-down of August.
Blanco Aluminization test 2009 summary [31]
The entire process takes about 6 days (from the moment the mechanics team start until they leave the telescope ready for optical alignment). This is a picture [32] of the 1998 aluminizing team.
Before the aluminizing chamber (start with the mirror set up on its pedestal in the washing area)
Inside the aluminizing chamber
This is done ideally with 6 people: 3 outside the mirror, 2 inside the central hole, 1 preparing materials.
Here is a list of materials [33]. THINK SAFETY! Wear plastic suit all the time. Wear heavy gloves, goggle and respiratory mask when manipulating acids.
Have a plan for what to do in case of acid accident.
A.0. Pour natural sponges in a bath of HCl+H2O (to disolve any residuals of shells), rinse with water and cycle 5 times in washing machine.
A.1. For rough degrease: 200 gr of soap into 10 liters of filtered water (poured into 3 buckets)
A.2. For removing aluminium : 10 liters HCl + 10 liters filtered water + 200 grams CuSO4. !!CHANGE: a 15% HCl solution is enough (see how to apply it below)!!
A.3. For final degrease: 1 kg KOH into 20 liters of filtered water
A.4. Clean the mirror with CO2 snow, measure reflectivity and photograph mirror
A.5. If necessary, lay lab wipes on oil spots to absorb oil
A.6. Wear surgical gloves
A.7. From now onto the drying phase, ALWAYS keep the mirror wet.
Rinse entire mirror with filtered water (3 hoses) for 5 min. NO contact.
A.8. Pour soap onto entire mirror around the circumference. NO contact. Rinse with filtered water. REPEAT this step twice.
A.9. Blot mirror with soapy sponges using only the weight of the sponge. NO wiping. 3 people on outside of mirror make 2 complete circles. 2 people in the central hole make 3 complete circles.
A.10. Wash sides of mirror with soap and dedicated sponge NOT to be used on mirror optical surface.
A.11. Rinse the entire mirror with filtered water.
A.12. REPEAT step A.9 to A11.
Figure 1: Mirror preparation & washing
B.1. Wear new surgical gloves + heavy gloves + goggle + respirator
B.2. One person pours HCl/CuSO4 around circumference of mirror while the 5 others drag-wipe with balls of cotton. Each cotton ball is used only for a maximum of 3 drag-wipe actions then replaced. Continue until aluminium is removed. !!CHANGE: cover the mirror with Kimwipes and pour HCl solution on them, they will keep the acid longer in contact with the coating and dissolve it without the need for a large quantity of acid!! Residual Al spot can we drag-wiped individually with a Kimwipe ball.
B3. Rinse with filtered water until pH is neutral. Rinse 2 minutes more with filtered water.
B4. Change to clean surgical gloves
B.5. One person pours KOH around circumference of mirror while the 5 others drag-wipe with cotton balls. Each cotton ball is used only for a maximum of 3 drag-wipe actions then replaced.
B.6. Rinse with filtered water until pH is neutral.
B.7. REPEAT steps B.5 to B.6
B.8. Rinse with filtered water 2 minutes more. Rinse carefully the mirror edge and the radial support mounts and holes.
C.1. Change to clean surgical gloves AND dust mask
C.2. Rinse with 50 liters DOUBLE distilled water pouring around the circumference. Check out that water flows uniformly on the surface, not leaving 'holes'that would be signs of broken surface tension of the liquid passing on a still-contaminated area.
C.3. 6 people using nozzle guns blow dry nitrogen from the outer diameter to the inner, making sure the water drops flows uniformly radially inward (look at them against the lights on the other side of the mirror. Dry as fast as possible to avoid water drying on its own. No contact with mirror during that phase. Bidistilled water is clean enough that the process doesn't leave water marks. Perform the breath test to detect any drying or contamination spots in any suspicious areas (breath gently on the mirror -dry your mouth first!- and watch out any pattern on the surface covered with moisture).
C.3. BIS. Old procedure: Have at least large 50 balls of Kimwipes ready and someone preparing more if necessary. They must be thick and wide, bigger than your hand. Rub (for the first time in the entire process) the mirror applying about 1-2 kg force on the Kimwipes balls. Do not overdo it! M he ball slowly to suck the water. Use each ball ONLY FOR ONE drag-wipe action then replace it (this is very important!!!). Work moving regularly around the mirror. As the mirror dries, you will have to work faster. Constantly check the entire mirror surface for areas that need attention. MAKE SURE your (dirty) sleeves are not touching the glass when you dry reaching far with your arm!! DO NOT let the mirror dry on its own! DO NOT wipe dry areas! Use Balzers virgin optical cotton cloth for touch ups. Check any visible stains and streaks with bright light and different viewing angles. It is hard to make the mirror better but easy to make it worse.
C4. Dry sides of the mirror and holes of the radial support mounts with Kimwipes. Use dry nitrogen to CAREFULLY blow out holes. Take care not to spray water on the optical surface.
C5. Hang up mirror in its hook. Clean with acetone the bottom of the mirror especially the 3 pads. Dry bottom of mirror with Kimwipes. DO A THOROUGH cleaning of all the non optical surfaces of the mirror for complete degreasing and drying.
C.6. Setup mirror on aluminizing tank floor. Blow off dust with CO2: MAKE ABSOLUTELY sure the substrate is free of dust (other wise the coating will be full of pinholes). Put 4 clean microscope test plates (coating witness samples) on edge of mirror. Seal tank.
Note: units used are : 1.3x10-6 atm = 1 micron (Hg) = 1 millitorr (=0.13 Pa)
Vacuum gauge positions: (to be checked)
1 is chamber
2 is holding pump
3 and 4 are the diffusion pumps
5 is roughing pump
Be careful: do not disconnect a vacuum sensor turned ON. Let any pump run for 1 min (listen the noise) before turning ON any vacuum gauge.
We indicate a typical elapsed time.
See pictures of the inside of the chamber: (Figure 2) general view of the chamber ceiling where you can recognize : the filaments in the round holes cut in the baffle sheet, the upper window used for checking the evaporation rate of aluminium and the cable feed-though port; (Figure 3) close view showing: the 4 concentric filament annuli (number of filaments per ring, from outermost to innermost: 36, 32, 20, 16 = 104 in total), the glow discharge ring (between annulus 2 and 3), part of the entrance conduit of one diffusion pump, the nitrogen pipe (near the bottom).
Figure 2: Inside the chamber |
Figure 3: Inside the chamber |
A.1. Work inside the chamber with clean white suit, gloves and shoes protectors. Wash the internal walls, windows and chamber floor with acetone (DON'T remove the side windows, it is hard to re-seal them). Chase any greasy spots!
A.2. Wash with HCl (strip off the aluminium) the feed-through cables contacts, the holding ring insulator.
Figure 4
A.3. For better thickness uniformity, it is recommended to put filaments only in the outer rings. ±9% uniformity is reached that way (versus ±27% with all the arrays!). Check carefully all the filaments and replace the damaged ones: knock them with the finger to see if they don't break, they must be straight when loose (i.e. unstressed), not covered with blobs of aluminium. The filaments shall not touch the baffle mesh (to avoid short circuits) and be all at the same distance above the baffle (0.25 to 0.5"). IMPORTANT: tighten the filaments with a torque wrench to about 15 in-lbs so that the current that flows in them is uniform.
A.4. Hang 3 aluminium clips at both extremities of each filaments
Figure 5: Filaments
A.5. Clean and lubricate the chamber Orings with high-vacuum grease. Don't lubricate the entire flange (but just the Oring). Don't put grease in excess! Close the chamber and put the C-clamps around the perimetral flange.
A.6. Run a typical vacuum sequence as described in B.1 to B.44 with 30 minutes minimum of glow discharge and eventually filament heating -but NOT LOADED with Aluminium clips!- to outgass them all (especially the new ones).
Figure 6: Control Panel
Most useful schematic diagram of the valves
Figure 7: Diagram of the valves
Install the mirror and the coating monitor [41] in the chamber (check that it works!). Put test plates on the edges of the mirror along the perimeter. Close the chamber and put C-clamps.
B.1. Connect flexible pipe of roughing pump to chamber (clean and lubricate Oring) and loosen the 2 adjusting rods.
Figure 8
B.2. Connect 3 cylinders of liquid nitrogen (N2): one on each diffusion pump, one for the internal circuit (Meisner trap)
B.3. Open air valve in lateral wall (red flexible pipe)
B.4. Connect water lines to the coating monitor. Open water circuit (diffusor cooler): 2 valves -input/output- on pipes in backside wall ; (roughing pump is cooled with oil)
B.5. Check air pressure on diffusion pump: must read 70-75 psi (compressor is 100psi and feeds all valves)
Figure 9
B.6.1. Connect roughing pump to energy on the wall (and unplug the M floor 'helicopter' fan). Turn ON air extractor on P floor (otherwise smoke will come out the roughing pump grey pipes).
B.6.2. Check switches: "manual" (key) and "all valves closed" (black knob). TURN ON power of control panel.
B.7. Test-cycle all valves (open/closed). The holding pump must be ON for the holding valves to work. Throttle valves leds don't shine (just watch the meter). Leave them all CLOSED including the mechanical needle valve for air inlet during glow discharge.
B.8. 0min: TURN ON roughing (mechanical) pump and immediately open foreline valves 1 and 2 (this starts pumping the diffusion pumps).
B.9. When diffusion pumps are below 20 microns (35 at least), TURN ON holding pump.
B.10. When holding pump is below 20 microns, close foreline valves 1 and 2, and open holding valves 1 and 2. Check vacuum in diffusion pumps (should remain the same at 20 microns). TURN OFF roughing pump (the holding pump is now holding the vacuum in the diffusion pumps).
B.11. TURN ON diffusion pumps 1 and 2 (it won't work if the water flow is below 3 GPM or if the diffusion pump pressure is above 25 torrs). TURN ON liquid level controllers (LN2 to diffusion pumps) and open slowly the 2 nitrogen cylinders valves (20 psi) to avoid freezing the controllers. Leave them open.
B.12. When the roughing line is at atmosphere, TURN ON the roughing pump and immediately open upper and lower roughing valves if not already opened (the roughing pump is now pumping the chamber). Check no excessive heat of diffusors.
B.13. Fan of roughing pump will power off (NOISE) automatically after 25 minutes, sign that vacuum is getting better.
B.14. 45min: When chamber pressure is around 20 microns, close upper and lower roughing valves. If vacuum in chamber doesn't seem to progress below 25 microns after some time, turn on the more reliable high vacuum gauge (cold cathode).
B.15. When the roughing line reads 10 microns, open foreline valves 1 and 2 (the roughing pump is now pumping the diffusion pump as is the holding pump).
B.16. Open throttle valves 1 and 2. Open high vacuum valves 1 and 2, waiting about 1 min between the aperture of both valves in order to prevent oil backstreaming (the diffusion pumps are now pumping the chamber).
B.17. Close holding valves 1 and 2. TURN OFF holding pump.
B.18. TURN ON high vacuum gauges (if the cold cathode is dirty, it might takes a while before it starts reading). When chamber reaches 5x10-5 torrs, TURN ON nitrogen cylinder valve for Meisner trap and corresponding liquid level controller.
B.19. 1h45min: When chamber reaches 1x10-5 torrs, reverse the process to be able to do the GLOW DISCHARGE:
B.20. Turn off high vacuum gauges, close high vacuum valves 1 and 2 and throttle valves 1 and 2.
B.21. TURN ON holding pump, close foreline valves 1 and 2. Open holding valves 1 and 2 (the holding pump pumps the diffusion pump). Check pressure in diffusion pumps.
B.22. Open upper and lower roughing valves (the roughing pump pumps the chamber).
B.23. Open air inlet needle valve by 1.25 turn and use the inlet switch to set and maintain the chamber pressure at 35 microns, which is the appropriate pressure to run the glow discharge safely. Glow discharge provides outgassing of the substrate through heating, conversion of organic substances into their volatile components and desorption of films through electrons impact.
B.24. Turn on glow discharge controller. Slowly raise the current to 3 Amps in 2 minutes. Voltage will read about 3000 Volts (if the meter works!). A uniform purple color will be visible inside the chamber. If pink arcs or flashes show up (usually at 30mic), the pressure is too low, so open air inlet valve to raise the pressure back to about 35-40 microns. The ionized air will bombard the residual sticky hydrocarbons and, by transfer of kinetic energy, help to remove them from the surfaces (especially the mirror's). Monitor the discharge for 10 to 30 minutes. Reduce the current to 0 in 30 seconds. CLOSE the needle valve by hand.
Figure 10
B.25. 2h20min: close upper and lower roughing valves. When the roughing line reads 10 microns, open foreline valves 1 and 2.
B.26. Open throttle valves 1 and 2. Open high vacuum valves 1 and 2 with the same 1-min waiting precaution (the diffusion pumps are now pumping the chamber again).
B.27. Close holding valves 1 and 2. Turn off holding pump.
B.28. TURN ON high vacuum gauges. They should read 1x10-5 torrs in a few minutes.
B.29. 2h45min: cold cathodes should read around 8x10-6 torrs.
B.30. 3h30min: cold cathodes should read at least around 6x10-6 torrs, which is just enough to aluminize (the higher the vacuum beyond that limit, the better):
B.31. Turn off all kinds of fans (Pump floor for example) to avoid vibrations in the floor.
B.32. 4h40min: Install the coating monitor [41] on top of the chamber near the window and check its parameters. With the 4 filament arrays, the chamber deposits an uneven film: 65% at r=20", 100% at r=45" and 50% at r=80". The tickness monitor is measuring at r=20", so in order to obtain 1000 Angstroms maximum thickness on the mirror, the firing should be stopped when the thickness monitor indicates 650 Ang. After you power off the filaments, the evaporation still goes on for about 70 Ang., so you should power off at about 580 Ang.
B.35. Let the filaments cool for 15 min.
B.36. TURN OFF all gauges control.
B.37. CLOSE high vacuum valves 1 and 2. CLOSE throttle valves 1 and 2. TURN OFF liquid level controllers.
B.38. CLOSE foreline valves 1 and 2. TURN OFF roughing pump. TURN ON holding pump.
B.39. When pressure in holding lines is below 20 microns, OPEN Holding valves 1 and 2. TURN OFF Diffusion pumps.
B.40. Release slowly for 1min air to the chamber (big manual valve in the back) then open it completely. Let air get in 20min.
B.41. UNPLUG the LN2 cylinders and clean the lines with compressed air.
B.42. When the chamber is at atmospheric pressure, disconnect the head of the roughing pump and open the chamber. Remove test plates and mirror. Close the chamber.
B.43. When the diffusion pumps are cool to touch, CLOSE holding valves 1 and 2. TURN OFF Holding pump. TURN OFF control power. TURN OFF key switch.
B.44. TURN OFF air and water to diffusion pumps. CLOSE big manual air release valve.
** The goal is to deposit a layer of Aluminium of 950 Angstroms (±5%) of thickness on the glass (the chamber is capable of ±10% thickness uniformity when using the outer array only). Above 1000 Ang. thick, the coating will start showing more and more surface roughgness which will increase scatter. A thickness of at least 500 Ang. is required to maintain the transmission through the coating below 0.1%. The faster the evaporation rate is better because the vapour of Aluminium doesn't get much time to be contaminated with oxygen or other residual gases in the chamber. A rapidly deposited coating is more compact and show less surface roughness. Once the Al coating enters in contact with air, a 30 to 40 Angstroms-thick layer of Aluminium oxide (Al2O3) will quickly form on the surface and protect the Aluminium from tarnishing. This layer also hardens tremendously the Al (Knoop hardness of 2100 kg.mm-2 compared to 140 kg.mm-2 for bulk Al). Final experiments to check quality of aluminizing: look for water marks; put some sticky tape on edge of mirror and watch for aluminium peeling off; look at bright incandescent bulb from the edge of the mirror through the glass: the bulb should barely be visible. Inside the chamber, check the status of all the filaments : broken ones, clips not melted, eventual short circuits,... which will give you a better idea of the thickness uniformity.
Note: chemical processes in the obtention of the vacuum
Schematic diagram of the diffusion pump
Figure 11
Maxime Boccas, last revision on 2th of August 2000.
Max Boccas, last revision on February 1st, 2001
This operation is conducted every 6 months. This is a 5 people job: 2 persons are needed for the washing and at least 3 assistants (one near the mirror to pass on the goods and change the hose connections, one near the buckets to change the water pump from one to the other, and one on the M floor to open water and check water exhaust). Here follows a list of materials used, a description of the process and some images:
Last revised on February 2, 2001, Maxime Boccas
Al & W from (1975-2001)
W stands for washing; Al stands for aluminizing
Date | 4.0-m | 1.5-m | 1.0-m | 0.9-m | Schmidt | instruments |
3-Oct-01 | W M1 | |||||
4-Aug-01 | W M1 | |||||
30-Apr-01 | W M1 | |||||
9-Apr-01 | W M1 | |||||
8-Mar-01 | W M3 (TT box) | |||||
1-Feb-01 | W M1 | |||||
30-Jan-01 | Al M2(F8) | |||||
3-Nov-00 | W M1 | |||||
2-Nov-00 | W M1 | |||||
9-Oct-00 | W M2(F8) | |||||
6-Sep-00 | W M1 | |||||
Aug-00 | Al M1 | |||||
12-Apr-00 | W M1 | |||||
21-Mar-00 | W M1 | |||||
9-Nov-99 | Al mirror(?) Hydra 4m | |||||
24-Aug-99 | Al M2s | |||||
31-May-99 | Al M1+M2 | |||||
1-Dec-98 | Al M1+M2 | |||||
25-Sep-98 | Al col Hydra 4m | |||||
31-Aug-98 | Al M1 | |||||
5-Aug-98 | Al M1 | |||||
9-Dec-97 | Al M2 | |||||
16-Jun-97 | Al M1 | |||||
9-Apr-97 | Al M1 | |||||
17-Aug-96 | Al M2(F14) | |||||
28-Jun-96 | Al M1 | |||||
12-Jul-95 | Al M2s | |||||
25-Apr-95 | Al M1 | |||||
18-Oct-94 | Al M1 | |||||
10-Aug-94 | Al M1 | |||||
23-Jun-94 | Al M1 | |||||
29-Dec-93 | Al M2(F8) | |||||
14-Oct-92 | Al M1 | |||||
5-Oct-92 | Al M1 | |||||
8-Sep-92 | Al M2s | |||||
17-Jul-92 | Al M1 | |||||
23-Oct-91 | Al M1 | |||||
9-Sep-91 | Al Cam Echelle 4m | |||||
30-Aug-91 | A M2(F7.5) | |||||
27-May-91 | Al M1 | |||||
5-Aug-90 | Al M1+M2 | |||||
13-Aug-90 | Al M1+M2 | |||||
19-Jul-90 | Al M1 | |||||
15-Nov-89 | Al M1 | |||||
19-Dec-88 | Al M2(F7.5) | |||||
26-Aug-88 | Al col spectro 4m | |||||
30-Aug-88 | Al M1 | |||||
30-Jun-88 | Al M1 | |||||
31-May-88 | Al M1 | |||||
Jan-88 | Al Newton | |||||
18-Aug-86 | Al M1 | |||||
21-Mar-86 | Al M1 | |||||
28-May-85 | Al M1 | |||||
7-May-85 | Al M1 | |||||
12-Jun-84 | Al M1+M2(F7.5) | |||||
23-Aug-83 | Al M1 | |||||
21-Jul-83 | Al M1 | |||||
24-May-83 | Al M1+M2(F13.5) | |||||
24-Nov-82 | Al M1 | |||||
3-Aug-82 | Al M2(F8) | |||||
13-Jul-82 | Al M2 | |||||
8-Jun-82 | Al M2 | |||||
13-Apr-82 | Al M1 | |||||
8-Sep-81 | Al M1 | |||||
15-Jul-81 | Al M1 | |||||
14-Apr-81 | Al M1 | |||||
25-Nov-80 | Al M1 | |||||
20-Nov-80 | Al 4m rotator mirror | |||||
28-May-80 | W M2(F13.5) | |||||
31-Aug-79 | Al M1 | |||||
21-Aug-79 | Al M2 | |||||
9-Jul-79 | Al M1 | |||||
14-Jun-79 | Al M1 | |||||
9-Apr-79 | Al M2s | |||||
13-Mar-79 | Al M1 | |||||
21-Aug-78 | Al M2 | |||||
14-Aug-78 | Al M1+M2 | |||||
18-Jul-78 | Al M1 | |||||
12-Jun-78 | Al M1 | |||||
29-Nov-77 | W corrector | |||||
22-Nov-77 | Al M1 | |||||
26-Oct-77 | Al M1 | |||||
7-Jul-77 | Al 4m rotator mirrors | |||||
29-Jun-77 | Al M1 | |||||
30-Mar-77 | Al Col. Spectro 4m | |||||
28-Sep-76 | Al M1 | |||||
Jul-76 | Al M2s | |||||
Jun-76 | Al M2 | |||||
18-Apr-76 | Al M1 | |||||
13-Nov-75 | Al M1 | |||||
Aug-75 | Al M1 | |||||
Date | 4.0-m | 1.5-m | 1.0-m | 0.9-m | Schmidt | instruments |
This aluminizing chamber accepts mirror up to 1.5m in diameter and is used for all CTIO mirrors but the 4m M1.
Mirror washing: see 4.0-m procedure [57].
Picture of the 0.9m tel M1 mirror [58] after sitting 2 years in the tube without any cleaning and a picture of the washing [59] (aluminium removal with acid).
Note: units used are : 1.3x10-6 atm = 1 micron (Hg) = 1 millitorr (=0.13 Pa)
Vacuum sensors and controllers: on the main panel, there is an analog controller NRC725 (Norton) for the Varian 524-2 cold cathode (1 input, reading from 10-3 to 10-7 torrs), and for Varian 531 thermocouples (2 inputs: not used not working anymore!). On top of the panel, there is an extra analog controller NRC721 fot 531 thermocouples (2 inputs: one for the diffusion pump and one for the tank, both reading from atm to 5 microns). There is also a thermocouple in the roughing line, which can be used to check good funcionning of the pump (turn off the meter, unplug the diffuser sensor and plug into the roughing line). Calibration of that dual thermocouple meter must be checked: when rough vacuum is reached in the roughing line (close diffuser and tank valves and plug the sensor in the roughing line), press the 'fil MA' button and turn the 'fil adj' knob until the needle reads 200 on the top red scale.
We indicate the elapsed time for the aluminizing (rather slow in this example, the entire process could last as little as 3h00).
A.1. Put a roll of paper on the bottom of the chamber to step inside without leaving dirt.
A.2. Replace all the damaged filaments (there are 24 of them on a single diameter): they must be straight when loose (i.e. unstressed), not covered with aluminium (drops). See picture [60] of this operation inside the chamber. Press gently the filaments with the fingers : if they are stressed, they break immediately. Filaments can usually be used for 2-3 aluminizings. Handling of the filaments must be done with gloves to avoid their contamination with grease.
A.3. Prepare 96 aluminium clips and wash them in acetone. Hang 4 clips per filament : one on each loop. Again use gloves to hung the clips.
A.4. Check thoroughly cleanliness of chamber, wash walls with acetone and all the surfaces touched by hands or tools, check the chamber Orings (clean and lubricate)
A.5. Use mouth mask from the moment the mirror is dried out until the chamber is closed. Wash with acetone the inside of the mirror holding ring and attach to the mirror. Bring the mirror into the aluminizing tank (picture [61]). Wash with acetone the outside of the mirror holding ring and any spots touched by tools.
A.6. Install the thickness monitor: it must face the center of the filament array and be at the same distance from the filaments as the mirror (otherwise you need to enter a 'Tooling' coefficient in the thickness monitor meter. Check that it is working (see instructions [41])
A.7. Blow off laterally dust with dry nitrogen. This is a critical step to ensure that the mirror is absolutely free of dust. Close tank and seal it by tightening the 4 bolts. Add at least 2 C-clamps near the top (original bolts are missing).
B.1. 0 min: Connect black and orange power cables (filaments and glow discharge) on the side of the main control panel. Connect 2nd black cable from glow discharge controler to valve at the rear of the tank (on the air inlet tube). Connect main thick black power cable to wall plug.
B.2. Take the extremity of the black flexible exhaust water pipe outside the building.
B.3. Open the water circuit valve (green pipe), the valve to the roughing pump and to the thickness monitor.
B.4. Close the copper tube valve (water to diffuser) on the right side of the control panel
B.5. See all following elements described on picture 1 [63]. Connect the tank vacuum gauge. Close both valves (diffuser and tank): the handle of the tank (top valve) should be on the left side and the handle of the diffuser (bottom valve) should be on the right side.
B.6. Picture 2 [64]. Turn on the air compressor: it must show 100 lbs to be able to open/close the diffuser valve. Make sure the voltage wheels for glow discharge and filaments are at 0 and their respective controllers off.
B.7 Turn on the roughing pump, plug a thermocouple into the line and check the meter calibration (as described above) once good vacuum is reached (5 um). Reconnect the sensor to the diffuser and open the diffuser valve.
B.8. When diffuser gets to 5 microns, close diffuser valve and open tank valve. Some smoke is generated by the compressor for a few minutes: close the doors and turn on the room air extractor.
B.9. 25 min: When tank vacuum reads 200 microns, turn on the power knob on the control panel to start the glow discharge. Turn control knob to raise current progressively up to 500mA (about 700V) (picture [65]) and check the ionization color in the tank (watch out for arcs). The vacuum should drop around 30 microns. Maintain glow discharge for 20min. Decrease slowly to zero the voltage, switch off the controller and turn off the glow discharge power knob on the main control panel.
B.10. 1h35min: When tank is at 5 microns, close the 2 valves (diffuser and tank) and open the poppet valve (diffuser-to-tank valve) by switching on the appropriate knob (this makes a loud noise, don't panic!). Turn on the diffuser, the refrigeration and open the copper tube water inlet. Turn off the vacuum gauge and turn on the cold cathode on the first scale (10-3 to 10-5 torr).
B.11. Open the diffuser valve (so that the roughing pump starts pumping the tank through the diffuser).
B.12. 3h50min: the tank reaches 4x10-5. Check the thickness monitor [41] is ready to use. Turn on the filaments power on the main panel (left 'low voltage' knob) and on the filament controller.
B.13. Always reading the values of the current on the wheel -not on the small meter- (picture [66]), raise slowly to 35A and check for 2-3 min until the filaments color is uniform.
B.14. Raise to 45A for 1 min, then to 55A for 2 min: you should see the aluminium melt on the filaments (the filaments darken, then redden again). The aluminizing process is initiated and you should see some activity on the thickness monitor display.
B.15. Raise to 65A for 30sec: all clips should be melted and the filaments of a uniform color with a deposition rate around 15A/sec. Raise to 80A for 30 sec then 90A until thickness reaches 890A (maximum rate should be around 17A/sec). Decrease the power down to 0 in 10 sec. Switch off the power on the controller and on the main panel. Real aluminizing time should be around 1min30sec and final thickness should be around 950A.
B.16. Close the poppet valve, and turn off the compressor. Switch off the diffusion pump. Turn off the cold cathode and disconnect it.
B.17. Open a little the air inlet valve to the tank (with a piece of cloth on the pipe entrance). When diffuser cooling water exhaust is cool again, close the diffuser valve, turn off the roughing pump, the refrigeration and close the main water valve on the wall (leave the copper tube opened).
B.18. It will take about 20 minutes for the tank to be at atmospheric pressure so that you can open it (listen when air leaking in stops).
B.19. Inspect carefully the coating and look for water marks with intense light shining on the coating. Check visually that there is no transmnission through the coating (ie. thickness is adequate) nor tiny 'dust' holes in it by shining a bright light from behind the mirror. Do the adhesive tape test on the edge of the mirror to check the quality(adhesion) of the coating. Measure the reflected and scattered light in 3 different places to compare with data before aluminizing.
Total: 4h30min.
Max Boccas, last revision on February 1st, 2001
Always check that you have plenty of pressure and reserve in the nitrogern gas cylinders before you start the washing process in order to make the drying fast and optimum.
Washing done in-situ. Remove chimney. Put telescope at ZD60deg to the south. Raise the platform as much as possible. Remove northern petal covering M1, install the pneumatic seal around M1 so that it protrudes about 20mm above the mirror edge, and inflate it. Seal VERY carefully the space between the chimney base and the inner hole of the mirror with duct tape. If you don't remove the instrument from the telescope, make very sure all the seal are effective! Prepare a warm and highly concentrated solution of orvus soap and water (lot of foam). Rinse with tap water and hose. Use the vacuum cleaner to suck water. Contact-wash with the natural sponge and the soapy solution, and try to maintain the glass wet and covered with foam for 5 minutes (the idea is to unstick the dust and also degrease). Rinse with tap water. As usual, observe how the water is flowing on the surface, any abnormal surface tension showing up will indicate a residual grease that has to be removed. Never let the mirror dry. Finally rinse with bidistilled water (about 6-8 liters needed in small 1 liter bottle) and dry with at least one high pressure nitrogen gas gun (check you have plenty of pressure in the nitrogen cylinder before you start). Dry carefully with KImwipes all the water drops remaining around the mirror. With lot of care to avoid trapped water jumping, remove the inflatable seal and unstick the adhesive tape.
Remove the cell from the tube, incline it by 5-10deg. Mirror stays in cell. Seal the inner hole by forming around it a 2"-high cylindrical wall with duct tape and seal the outer diameter with the special plastic round skirt and duct tape. Contact-wash with sponge and soapy solution. Suck the water from the lower side of the mirror with vacuum cleaner. Dry with 2 nitrogen gas guns. The entire process takes about 3-4 hours (the washing itself takes 30min at most) and can be done without engineering time as the telescope collimation is not affected once the cell is reinstalled.
Bring the telescope at D=30deg North (same position as M1 cleaning) and work inside the chimney with proper working light. First blow off dust with dry nitrogen. Only about 100ml of dichlorodimethylsilane (DDMS) is used in a goose-neck plastic bottle. A large plastic bag is taped on the lower half of the cell perimeter to force water to flow directly into it. Two Orings seal the top element with the cell and the cell itself so that no liquid can get inside the corrector assembly (see CH2903-E003) but you still need to take some care. Use some Kim-wipes towels placed at the bottom of the lens to suck liquid as it flows down the glass, and change the towels once they are too wet. Dry off with nitrogen gas. The entire process takes at most 1h.
IMPORTANT: solgel coatings are hygroscopic (they absorb water) and deteriorate over time. Waterproofing is achieved by rinsing the coating with a solution of DDMS with ethanol to a concentration of 5 parts per million. Alcohol is not good because it will wash off the DDMS and leave the solgel unprotected against humidity! Be careful, DDMS is very nasty stuff. Prepare the dilution in 2 steps: first 0.1ml of DDMS into 100ml of ethanol and then 0.5ml of this solution into 100ml of ethanol.
Remove cell from box, remove mirror from cell (it is pushed against a reference corner with 2 plungers), and wash in a soapy and warm bath, rinse and dry with nitrogen gas. Some minor tilt adjustment is needed when its cell returns into the box (do it with Osiris pupil imagery).
0.9-m Washing 5Feb09 [67]
1.0m Washing 5Feb09 [68]
April 11, 2001, Maxime Boccas
We are using the equipment sold by the R.Zito company. It consists of a 99.99% pure liquid CO2 tank (with syphon) connected to an adjustable valve and a long nozzle blowing CO2 snow at high speed. The liquid CO2 (-56.6ºC), when released out through a fine nozzle, will suddenly expands without exchanging heat (adiabatic expansion), thus becoming a mixture of gaseous CO2 and dry ice. Two principles govern the cleaning technique: 1/ When colliding with dust particles, the snow flakes transmit their momentum which makes the dust move away, and 2/the frozen dust particles contract and break free from the surface. Blowing gas is much less efficient because the dust particles are much heavier than the molecules of gas blown. In theory (and it has been demonstrated in practice by many experiments), the flakes don't scratch the coating because they slide over the surface on a cushion of CO2 gas which sublimes off the flakes.
Remember that when fresh Aluminium is exposed to air, a thin layer (about 30 Angstroms) of aluminium oxide Al2O3 will form on the surface. That layer is a tremendous protection as its Knoop hardness is 2100 kg.mm-2 (compared to only 140 kg.mm-2 for bulk Aluminium).
We also use a filter at the output of the tank to prevent oil residuals from contaminating the mirror (this oil could have been introduced accidentally in the tank when filling up at the factory). The filter is supposed to clean up to 100 tanks of CO2.
A copy of the Spanish instruction booklet ("Instrucciones para el aparato de limpieza que utiliza la nieve de dioxido de carbono", 1995) is kept in the old console room of the 4m telescope.
CALCULATE WHETHER THERE IS A RISK OF CONDENSATION ON THE MIRROR!! [93]
Zito R., Cleaning large optics with CO2 snow, SPIE vol. 1236, Advanced Technology Optical Telescopes IV (1990), p 952
Zito R., Removal of adsorbed gases with CO2 snow, SPIE vol. 1494, Space Astronomical Telescopes and Instruments (1991), p 427
Kimura W. and Kim G., Comparison of laser and CO2 snow cleaning of astronomical mirror samples, SPIE vol. 2199, Advanced Technology Optical Telescopes V (1994), p1165
Magrath B. and Nahrstedt D., A cleaning process for the CFHT primary mirror, PASP 108, July 1996, p620
Torii Y., Hayashi S. and Toda M., In-situ cleaning of the primary mirror of Subaru telescope, SPIE vol. 3352, Advanced Technology optical/IR telescopes VI (1998), p 808
The entire process (from taking over the telescope and cleaning the mirror to bringing it back to the zenith) takes about 25 minutes at the 4m. At the 4m, bring the telescope down toward the Cassegrain access stairs (North). Set up the ladder on the edge of the mirror cover petals, lay the wooden board between the ladder and the inside wall of the mirror cell. Don't forget to use shoe protectors when you enter the mirror area. Unroll the flexible high pressure line from the tank. Open the tank.
Before cleaning, take a measurement of the reflected light and scattered light of the surface in a few spots. Hang the ground cable of the nozzle to the hook on the chimney (to prevent static electricity discharge to the operator). Open gently the nozzle valve and let the CO2 snow blow away from the mirror for 15 seconds, the jet should be between 1 and 2 meters long. Then start flushing the mirror from the top to the bottom, successively on each side of the chimney. Try to maintain the nozzle extremity 30 to 40 cm above he mirror with the jet incidence angle at 45 degrees and move the nozzle in a regular pattern at a speed equivalent to 1m2 in 20 seconds. If ever the nozzle gets obstructed (by a "cork" of snow), close the nozzle valve, close the tank, open the nozzle valve to empty the line. Warm up the valve with your hands or wait a few minutes, shaking gently the nozzle.
Repeat the same steps to terminate the process (i.e. make sure the line is emptied). Don't forget to measure the reflectivity/scattering when you are done.
All the updated programs are stored in /ua76/boccas/4m/to_run_shap/
SETUP:
Maxime Boccas, 4Feb01
Revision of J.Baldwin's notes from 17Dec98
All the updated programs are stored in /ua76/boccas/4m/make_lookup/
intable1= | "xgrid.out") | input files to fit to |
intable2= | "outpos.in") | positions at which to evaluate fit |
outtable= | "xinterp.out") | list of output tables |
(xname= | "c1") | name of column for X values |
(yname= | "c2") | name of column for Y values |
(zname= | "c3") | name of column for Z values |
(xorder= | 3) | number of coefficients in X |
(yorder= | 3) | number of coefficients in Y |
(x1= | INDEF) | minimum X value for fit |
(x2= | INDEF) | maximum X value for fit |
(y1= | INDEF) | minimum Y value for fit |
(y2= | INDEF) | maximum Y value for fit |
(cross_terms= | yes) | include cross-terms? |
(function= | "chebyshev") | function to be fit |
(verbose= | yes) | print file names? |
(coefficients= | no) | print coefficients? |
(Version= | "8February1994") | date of installation |
(mode= | "al") |
0.0000 | 0.0170 | 0.0360 | 0.0568 | 0.0793 | 0 | 191 | 190 | 190 | 190 |
0.0000 | 0.0122 | 0.0253 | 0.0373 | 0.0455 | 0 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 185 |
0.0000 | 0.0056 | 0.0121 | 0.0167 | 0.0158 | 0 | 155 | 163 | 169 | 177 |
0.0000 | 0.0053 | 0.0074 | 0.0085 | 0.0084 | 0 | 90 | 90 | 102 | 119 |
0.0000 | 0.0117 | 0.0177 | 0.0172 | 0.0129 | 0 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
0.0000 | 0.0162 | 0.0291 | 0.0356 | 0.0263 | 0 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
0.0000 | 0.0156 | 0.0293 | 0.0412 | 0.0511 | 0 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
0.0000 | 0.0098 | 0.0141 | 0.0165 | 0.0457 | 0 | 356 | 343 | 288 | 240 |
0.0000 | 0.0042 | 0.0117 | 0.0271 | 0.0495 | 0 | 287 | 247 | 229 | 221 |
0.0000 | 0.0095 | 0.0237 | 0.0412 | 0.0604 | 0 | 220 | 217 | 216 | 217 |
0.0000 | 0.0154 | 0.0339 | 0.0538 | 0.0743 | 0 | 206 | 206 | 208 | 213 |
0.0000 | 0.0183 | 0.0389 | 0.0616 | 0.0857 | 0 | 198 | 198 | 199 | 202 |
0.0000 | 0.0170 | 0.0360 | 0.0568 | 0.0793 | 0 | 191 | 190 | 190 | 190 |
Maxime Boccas, 4Feb01
The collimation of this telescope is difficult mostly because the secondary mirror cells don't have position gauges (allowing control of what you are doing) and the f/13.5 cell is not kinematic at all but rather a complex puzzle where center and tilt are sometimes coupled on a single screw... So follow this guideline to avoid a nightmare. For your reference, the best images (FWHM) obtained for typical R-band 30sec exposures are: 0.60" at F/13.5 on-axis (classical Cassegrain) and 0.85" at F/7.5 over the FOV. (RC Cassegrain)
IN PRACTICE, start with F/13.5. Tweak the tilt of M1 to get proper collimation at F/13.5. Then flip to F/7.5 and if the collimation is not adequate, use ONLY the adjustment screws (center and tilt) of M2 to get it right. DO NOT modify the tilt of M1 anymore obviously. The reason of that strategy is that you can't re-tweak the F/13.5 M2 at night-time while you can with the F/7.5 M2. I repeat: DO NOT in any case use the adjustment screws of F/13.5 M2 at night time because you will mess up everything.
Maxime Boccas, 9sept00, last updated 19june01
Only option 1 is readily doable any time at the telescope. Options 2 and 3 require more delicate adjustment inside the PF cage (see CH2150.540-C030 for details) as it has to be done at zenith with someone standing in the cage.
A 'pure' focal plane tilt (revealed by a defocus slope across the field) can be corrected by tilting MOSAIC at its interface with the PFC with push-pull screws. Beware at the installation of Mosaic: these captured screws must normally be loose to avoid a non-intentional focal plane tilt (it happened once)!
The PFC is designed to deliver a 48 arcmin non-vignetted field with FWHM under 0.5arcsec at the edge of the field (see Tom Ingerson's paper [105]). The PFC optics include a field corrector for coma (paraboloidal M1) and spherical aberration (Ritchey-Chretien M1) and an Atmospheric Dispersion Corrector (2 pairs of rotating cemented prisms).
In terms of alignment requirements, the PFC optics have little optical power (1.076) thus are relatively insensitive to tilt, and behave like the M2 of a Cassegrain telescope where lateral centering is important to avoid misalignment coma. If decentering coma is present, the PFC optics must be translated laterally. In practice, for small corrections, we do tilt M1 instead. Zeroing the coma on-axis is not a sufficient condition. It is also important to check the field astigmatism off-axis (see simulations below). On-axis astigmatism doesn't reflect a misalignment problem but rather a problem with the cell of the primary mirror ("mirror pinched") and must be corrected via the active optics lookup table. If spherical aberration and/or field curvature are present, the longitudinal position of the PFC is not optimum and must be corrected by adjusting the back focal distance as Mosaic does not focus independently of the PFC (this was done once in Nov99 after the installation of MosaicII).
This can be done quickly by looking at a through-focus sequence for an on-axis star (9x100um steps is ideal, usually coma shows up nicely 200um away from best focus for a reasonnably bright star). Determine the cardinal direction of the coma (from the coma head to the tail): this side of M1 must be raised. The cardinal directions of the Mosaic field in the image display are: east is up, north is right. Alternatively, you can look for the minimum coma point in the entire field and consequently lower that part of the mirror. Iterate the adjusting tilts until the on-axis through-focus sequence is round and uniform. When wavefront errors are available from the Hartmann screen data, 1/1000 inches tilt is equivalent to an OPD of 230nm at the edge of the pupil, thus would correct about 230nm of coma measured on-axis. This is about the smallest correction that one can do with confidence and repeatability. Always keep a record of the tilt values of M1 (ie. values of the 3 hard points -south, northeast, northwest- dial gauges with air ON).
The following simulations are made at 650nm at zenith (ADC neutral). Only coma and astigmatism patterns do change; the trefoil pattern is not modified by misalignments. Reference field aberration maps for an aligned telescope are to be found in the PF imaging section of the main optics web page.
If astigmatism is present on-axis in a through-focus sequence, it is possible to correct for it with a TWEAK of the primary mirror (read first the TWEAK section of the 4m active optics on-line manual!). This is a 'quick-and-dirty' method but it can improve the images when the lookup table is not working well. On-axis astigmatism is caused by a non ideal support of M1 in the cell: that problem typically varies with telescope position, thus a TWEAK is valid only for a specific telescope position ±5deg (ie. about ±20min of exposure time). So if you follow the same object, you should actualize the TWEAK about every 40min.
Run the IRAF task mscexam on each out-of-focus image of a single star and look at the ellipticity angle (called 'pa') with the ',' option for example. To make sure that you are in presence of astigmatism, pa should flip by 90deg across best focus and be fairly stable on each side of the best focus. If the pa exhibits large variation and/or does not change roughly by 90deg across focus, don't even try that method!
Following is a list of measured pa for the IN-FOCUS image (called 'pa in') and the corresponding angle to enter in the tweak table of the tcp (called 'pa tweak'):
Examples:
What amplitude shall you enter in the tcp tweak table? This is even more empirical: in reasonnable seeing of 0.8", a 1um astigmatism will be visible at 100um off the best focus, but hardly visible at 50um... Once again, although this technique works, it is experimental and must be used with care until a better lookup table can be built. This method can actually also be used to update the astigmatism lookup table using the seeing images recorded every night (ie. not waiting for a dedicated engineering night).
Note: SCALE OF THE WAVEFRONT ERRORS (optical path difference at the edge of the pupil): at the 4m, 0.1" image degradation in d80 is produced by 0.70u of coma, 0.30um of astigmatism, 0.26um of trefoil, 0.24um of quadrafoil.
Maxime Boccas, 28March01
Presentation "Facts about coating and cleaning at CTIO" by Maxime Boccas. Mirror cleaning and coating conference. Palomar Observatory. 25-27 April 2001.
In one page [112]
Graphic version [113]
470nm | 530nm | 650nm | 880nm | |
4m plant | 92.6 | 93.0 | 89.3 | 88.0 |
1.5m plant | 92.4 | 92.7 | 89.1 | 89.0 |
Quoted by G. Hass | 92.1 | 91.6 | 90.5 | 88.0 |
Scatter (both plants) | 0.4% typical | |||
Micro-roughnes | 30 Å typical |
USUALLY NO WATER MARKS LEFT, EVEN IF WATER DRIES ON ITS OWN!
R400nm | R700nm | SC400nm | SC700nm | |
4m tel. | +0.35% | +0.38% | -0.24% | -0.32% |
1.5m tel. | +0.70% | +0.71% | -0.20% | -0.41% |
R0.9m | R1.5m | R4m | SC0.9m | SC1.5m | SC4m | |
Sep98 - Mar00 | -0.70 | -0.20 | -0.21 | +0.44 | +0.17 | +0.17 |
Mar00 - Nov00 | -0.66 | -1.30 | -0.71 | +0.32 | +0.55 | +0.31 |
Nov00 - Apr01 | -2.2 | -1.0 | -1.3 | +1.2 | +0.7 | +0.71 |
back to top [116]
Author: Maxime Boccas
Presentation given in the "Mirrror cleaning and coating conference"
Palomar Observatory
25-27 April 2001
graphic version [113]
Text version [112](one page)
Cleaning and coating 1 - TITLE [113]
Cleaning and coating 2 - COATING [117]
Cleaning and coating 3 [118]
Cleaning and coating 4 [119]
Cleaning and coating 5 [120]
Cleaning and coating 6 [121]
Cleaning and coating 7 - CLEANING [122]
Cleaning and coating 8 - CLEANING BEFORE ALUMINIZING [123]
Cleaning and coating 9 [124]
Cleaning and coating 10 - REGULAR IN-SITU WASHING [125]
Cleaning and coating 11 [126]
Cleaning and coating 12 - IN-SITU M1 WASHING RESULTS [127]
Cleaning and coating 13 - CONCLUSION [128]
Cleaning and coating 14 - OTHER OPTICS IN-SITU WASHING [129]
Cleaning and coating 15 - CO2 SNOW CLEANING [130]
Cleaning and coating 16 [131]
Cleaning and coating 17 [132]
Cleaning and coating 18 [133]
Cleaning and coating 19 [134]
Cleaning and coating 20 - CONCLUSION [135]
Cleaning and coating 21 [136]
Cleaning and coating 22 [137]
from the conference "Mirror cleaning and coating conference"
Palomar Observatory 25-27 April 2001
This page is available only in Spanish
Resumen basado en notas personales, documentos entregados y notas de Bruce Gillespie (APO) circuladas posteriormente en el grupo de discusion TOG. Se esta preparando un proceeding de la conferencia. La conferencia fue organizada por Mark Klaene (APO) y Bob Thicksten (Palomar). Algunas fotos del evento preparadas por APO se ven aqui [140].
No hacen lavado en situ. Aluminizado se hace en un edificio a 2 km de las cupulas con sala limpia de clase 5000 y extraccion de aire (3.5m^3/s) durante el uso de quimicos (especialmente acido y alcohol). Paul mostro un video muy interesante de 15min sobre estas actividades. Paul mostro graficos con mediciones de reflectividad y diffusion. Entrego una copia del estudio de pre-factibilidad del sputtering de plata por Linde. La sabiduria de Paul es: el espejo mas limpio no es el que limpiamos lo mas frecuentemente, pero el que ensuciamos lo menos frecuentemente.
Gary hizo varias muy buenas presentaciones acerca de varios temas, mostrando muchas fotos y algunos graficos de sus mediciones con el Minolta CM2002 (que calibra cada vez con un espejo protegido de referencia).
Tim mostro un video muy interesante de 20min, comentando las actividades de limpieza CO2, lavado y aluminizado.
May 8th, 2001, Maxime Boccas
RoboDimm at Cerro Tololo
Filter transmission measurement setup
A wide-field corrector design for the 1.5-m telescope
these pages can be found at http://www.ctio.noao.edu/telescopes/opteng/optics.html [114]
Blanco Shutdown Report, June 16th, 2009 powerpoint file [142], PDF file [143]
Mitutoyo 5th-17th June, 2009 [144] (Excel file)
Blanco IQ Status Summary 30th May, 2009 [145] (Excel file)
Blanco Al test 2009 Summary [146] (Excel file)
Blanco R & S follow-up [147] (PDF file)
Links
[1] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Optical-Status-2010
[2] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/PROMPT%20Reflectivity%20Report_Nov2009.pdf
[3] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/m1_r_sc_00.gif
[4] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/m1_r_99.gif
[5] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/m1_sc_99.gif
[6] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/m2_r_99.gif
[7] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/m2_sc_99.gif
[8] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/1.3%20Followup_Nov2009.pdf
[9] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/60_wash_mar00.gif
[10] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/60_r.gif
[11] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/60_sc.gif
[12] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/60co2gainr.gif
[13] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/60co2gainsc.gif
[14] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/60_bef_al_sep98.gif
[15] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/60_f135.gif
[16] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/60_f75.gif
[17] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/1.5%20Followup_Nov2009.pdf
[18] https://www.ctio.noao.edu/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=1404
[19] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/DocDB/0004/000402/001/Blanco_R%25-log-file.pdf
[20] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4mcurrentr.gif
[21] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4mcurrents.gif
[22] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4m_r_98_00.gif
[23] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4m_sc_98_00.gif
[24] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4mco2gainr.gif
[25] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4mco2gainsc.gif
[26] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4m_bef_wash_aug98.gif
[27] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4m_aft_al_aug98.gif
[28] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/Blanco%20R%20-%20S_follow-up-1.xls
[29] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/Blanco%20R%20follow%20up_Jan10.pdf
[30] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/reflectivities.gif
[31] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/blanco-al-tests-2009-summary.xls
[32] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/alum60.jpg
[33] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/materials
[34] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/alum10.jpg
[35] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/inchamb2.jpg
[36] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/inchamb.jpg
[37] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/glow.jpg
[38] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/filament.jpg
[39] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4mpanelvac.jpg
[40] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/panel0.jpg
[41] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/thickness-monitor
[42] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/vacback.jpg
[43] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/vacback2.jpg
[44] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/glowdis.jpg
[45] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/pump0_0.jpg
[46] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/alum50.jpg
[47] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/alum20.jpg
[48] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/alum40.jpg
[49] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/alum30.jpg
[50] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/wash1.jpg
[51] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/wash2.jpg
[52] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/wash3.jpg
[53] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/wash4.jpg
[54] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/wash5.jpg
[55] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/wash6.jpg
[56] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/wash7.jpg
[57] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/40-m-aluminizing-procedure
[58] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/dirty.jpg
[59] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/cleaning.jpg
[60] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/incam.jpg
[61] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/mirincam.jpg
[62] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/tabmain.jpg
[63] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/chambert1.jpg
[64] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/chambert.jpg
[65] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/tabglow.jpg
[66] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/tabfila.jpg
[67] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/0.9m_washing_5Feb09.pdf
[68] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/1.0m_washing_Feb09.pdf
[69] http://www.rdmathis.com/index.html
[70] http://www.rhcheney.com/index.html
[71] http://www.sig-inst.com/
[72] http://www.tungsten.com/mtsprod.html
[73] http://www.sylvania.com/
[74] http://www.newportlab.com/products.htm
[75] http://www.varianinc.com/cgi-bin/nav?/products/vacuum/
[76] http://www.thinfilmtech.net/
[77] http://www.dentonvacuum.com/
[78] http://www.uvmab.com/
[79] http://www.sspectra.com/index.html
[80] http://www.aip.org/avsguide/index.html
[81] http://www.targetmaterials.com/
[82] http://www.webelements.com/tungsten/
[83] http://www.vatran.com/index.html
[84] http://www.co2clean.com/
[85] http://www.dmo.be/
[86] http://www.schmitt-ind.com/
[87] http://www.konicaminolta.com/instruments/index.html
[88] http://www.photonicsonline.com/
[89] http://metals.about.com/od/sputteringtargets/Sputtering_Target_Suppliers.htm
[90] http://www.sputtercoat.com
[91] http://materion.com/Businesses/Barr%20Precision%20Optics%20and%20Thin%20Film%20Coatings.aspx
[92] http://setas-www.larc.nasa.gov/LDEF/MATERIALS/mat_databases.html
[93] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/ctio/4m/Condensation%20risk%20calulation.pdf
[94] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/shappzzhelp
[95] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/how-make-lookup-tables
[96] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4map2f8.gif
[97] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4map3f8.gif
[98] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/4map4f8.gif
[99] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Collimation-15-m
[100] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/collimation-40-m
[101] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/calibrations-positions-4map-lookup-tables
[102] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/iman-image-analizer
[103] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/iman-image-analizer#4.1
[104] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/focus60.gif
[105] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/PFADC
[106] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/zd0_650_x1m_coma.gif
[107] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/zd0_650_x1m_astig.gif
[108] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/zd0_650_x1m_0cast.gif
[109] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/zd0_650_y30ast.gif
[110] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/pfc720arcyas.gif
[111] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/pfc720arcxas.gif
[112] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Facts-about-coating-and-cleaning-CTIO
[113] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-Cleaning-1
[114] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/telescopes/opteng/optics.html
[115] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-Cleaning-index
[116] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao
[117] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-2
[118] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-3
[119] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-4
[120] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-5
[121] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-6
[122] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-7
[123] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-8
[124] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-9
[125] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-10
[126] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-11
[127] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-12
[128] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-13
[129] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-14
[130] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-15
[131] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-16
[132] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-17
[133] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-18
[134] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-19
[135] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-20
[136] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-21
[137] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/Coating-and-cleaning-22
[138] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/facts-about-coating-and-cleaning-ctio
[139] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/content/coating-and-cleaning-index
[140] http://www.apo.nmsu.edu/Telescopes/ARCprogress/041601palomar/default.htm
[141] http://www.apo.nmsu.edu/Telescopes/eng.papers/4010-24_spie.htm
[142] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/blanco_shutdown_report_160609.ppt
[143] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/Blanco_shutdown_report_160609.pdf
[144] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/mitutoyo_5-17june09.xls
[145] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/blancoiq-status-sumry_300509-1_0.xls
[146] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/blanco-al-tests-2009-summary_0.xls
[147] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/sites/default/files/telescopes/BlancoRfollowup_Jan10.pdf