Publications based on DECam data (2016)

Publications based on DECam data (2016) [1]

Community papers:

Belardi et al. (2016), MNRAS, 462, 2506: The DECam minute cadence survey - I [2]
Belokurov & Koposov (2016), MNRAS, 456, 602: Stellar streams around the Magellanic Clouds [3]
Bettinelli et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, L67: The Canarias Einstein Ring: a Newly Discovered Optical Einstein Ring [4]
Britt et al. (2016), MNRAS, 460, 2822: Discovery of a long-lived, high-amplitude dusty infrared transient [5]
Bruderer et al. (2016), ApJ, 817, 25: Calibrated Ultra Fast Image Simulations for the Dark Energy Survey [6]
Chen et al. (2016), ApJL, 827, L24: Discovery of a New Retrograde Trans-Neptunian Object: Hint of a Common Orbital Plane for Low Semimajor Axis, High-inclination TNOs and Centaurs [7]
Drlica-Wagner et al. (2016), ApJ, 833, L5: An Ultra-faint Galaxy Candidate Discovered in Early Data from the Magellanic Satellites Survey [8]
Forster et al. (2016), ApJ, 832, 155: The High Cadence Transient Survey (HITS). I. Survey Design and Supernova Shock Breakout Constraints [9]
Fotopoulou et al. (2016), A&A, 592, A5: The XXL Survey. VI. The 1000 brightest X-ray point sources [10]
Hargis et al. (2016), ApJ, 818, 39: Evidence That Hydra I is a Tidally Disrupting Milky Way Dwarf Galaxy [11]
Kim et al. (2016), ApJ, 820, 119: KIM 3: An Ultra-faint Star Cluster in the Constellation of Centaurus [12]
Kuzma et al (2016), MNRAS, 461, 3639: The outer envelopes of globular clusters – I. NGC 7089 (M2) [13]
Lavoie et al. (2016), MNRAS, in press: The XXL survey XV: Evidence for dry merger driven BCG growth in XXL-100-GC X-ray clusters [14]
Lee, Chien-Hsiu (2016), MNRAS, 462, 3006: A closer look at the Canarias Einstein ring [15]
Leloudas et al. (2016), Nature Astronomy, 1, 2: The superluminous transient ASASSN-15lh as a tidal disruption event from a Kerr black hole [16]
Mackey et al. (2016), MNRAS, 459, 239: A 10 kpc stellar substructure at the edge of the Large Magellanic Cloud: perturbed outer disc or evidence for tidal stripping? [17]
Martin et al. (2016), ApJL, 830, L10: SMASH 1: A Very Faint Globular Cluster Disrupting in the Outer Reaches of the LMC? [18]
Nugent et al (2016), AJ, 152, id.63: NEOWISE Reactivation Mission Year Two: Asteroid Diameters and Albedos [19]
Papovich et al (2016), ApJSS, 224, id.28: The Spitzer-HETDEX Exploratory Large-area Survey [20]
Roderick et al. (2016), MNRAS, 460, 30: Structural analysis of the Sextans dwarf spheroidal galaxy [21]
Roderick et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, 3702: Extended stellar substructure surrounding the Boötes I dwarf spheroidal galaxy [22]
Sheppard et al. (2016), ApJL, 825, L13: Beyond the Kuiper Belt Edge: New High Perihelion Trans-Neptunian Objects with Moderate Semimajor Axes and Eccentricities [23]
Sheppard & Trujillo (2016), AJ, 152, id.221: New Extreme Trans-Neptunian Objects: Toward a Super-Earth in the Outer Solar System [24]
Vivas et al. (2016), AJ, 151, 118: Variable stars in the field of the Hydra II ultra-faint dwarf galaxy [25]

Dark Enery Survey Collaboration papers:

Abbott et al. (2016), MNRAS, 460, 1270: The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview [26]
Abbott et al. (2016), Physical Review D, 94, id.022001: Cosmology from cosmic shear with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data [27]
Annis et al. (2016), ApJL, 823, L34: A Dark Energy Camera Search for Missing Supergiants in the LMC after the Advanced LIGO Gravitational-wave Event GW150914 [28]
Balbinot et al. (2016), ApJ, 820, 58: The Phoenix stream: a cold stream in the Southern hemisphere [29]
Baxter et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, 4099: Joint measurement of lensing–galaxy correlations using SPT and DES SV data [30]
Becker et al. (2016), Physical Review D, 94, id.022002: Cosmic shear measurements with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data [31]
Chang et al. (2016), MNRAS: Galaxy bias from the DES Science Verification data: combining galaxy density maps and weak lensing maps [32]
Cowperthwaite et al. (2016), ApJL, 826, L29: A DECam Search for an Optical Counterpart to the LIGO Gravitational-wave Event GW151226 [33]
Crocce et al. (2016), MNRAS, 455, 4301: Galaxy clustering, photometric redshifts and diagnosis of systematics in the DES Science Verification data [34]
Gerdes et al. (2016), AJ, 151, 39: Observation of Two New L4 Neptune Trojans in the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Fields [35]
Giannantonio et al. (2016), MNRAS, 456, 3213: CMB lensing tomography with the DES Science Verification galaxies [36]
Gruen et al. (2016), MNRAS, 455, 3367: Weak lensing by galaxy troughs in DES Science Verification data [37]
Jarvis et al. (2016), MNRAS: The DES Science Verification Weak Lensing Shear Catalogues [38]
Kacprzak et al. (2016), MNRAS, 463, 3653: Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data [39]
Kirk et al. (2016), MNRAS, 459, 21: Cross-correlation of gravitational lensing from DES Science Verification data with SPT and Planck lensing [40]
Luque et al. (2016), MNRAS, 458. 603: Digging deeper into the Southern skies: a compact Milky-Way companion discovered in first-year Dark Energy Survey data [41]
Li et al. (2016), ApJ, 817, 135: Discovery of a Stellar Overdensity in Eridanus–Phoenix in the Dark Energy Survey [42]
Li et al. (2016), AJ, 151, id.157: Assessment of Systematic Chromatic Errors that Impact Sub-1% Photometric Precision in Large-area Sky Surveys [43]
Melchior et al. (2016), Astronomy and Computing, 16, 99: Crowdsourcing quality control for Dark Energy Survey images [44]
Nord et al. (2016), ApJ, 827, id.51: Observation and Confirmation of Six Strong-lensing Systems in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data [45]
Palmese et al. (2016), MNRAS, in press: Comparing Dark Energy Survey and HST-CLASH observations of the galaxy cluster RXC J2248.7-4431: implications for stellar mass versus dark matter [46]
Pieres et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, 519: Physical properties of star clusters in the outer LMC as observed by the DES [47]
Rozo et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, 1431: redMaGiC: selecting luminous red galaxies from the DES Science Verification data [48]
Rykoff et al. (2016), ApJSS, 224, 1: The RedMaPPer Galaxy Cluster Catalog From DES Science Verification Data [49]
Soares-Santos et al. (2016), ApJL, 823, L33: A Dark Energy Camera Search for an Optical Counterpart to the First Advanced LIGO Gravitational Wave Event GW150914 [50]
Soergel et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, 3172: Detection of the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect with DES Year 1 and SPT [51]
Suchyta et al. (2016), MNRAS, 457, 786: No galaxy left behind: accurate measurements with the faintest objects in the Dark Energy Survey [52]
Smith et al. (2016), ApJ, 818, L8: DES14X3taz: A Type I Superluminous Supernova Showing a Luminous, Rapidly Cooling Initial Pre-peak Bump [53]
Zhang et al. (2016), ApJ, 816, 98: Galaxies in X-Ray Selected Clusters and Groups in Dark Energy Survey Data. I. Stellar Mass Growth of Bright Central Galaxies since z~1.2 [54]

Links
[1] http://www.ctio.noao.edu/noao/node/16385
[2] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.2506B
[3] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.456..602B
[4] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv160503938B
[5] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.2822B
[6] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817...25B
[7] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827L..24C
[8] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...833L...5D
[9] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832..155F
[10] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A%26A...592A...5F
[11] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818...39H
[12] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...820..119K
[13] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.3639K
[14] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1093/mnras/stw1906
[15] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.3006L
[16] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016NatAs...1E...2L
[17] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459..239M
[18] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830L..10M
[19] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152...63N
[20] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..224...28P
[21] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1093/mnras/stw949
[22] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.3702R
[23] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825L..13S
[24] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..221S
[25] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv151005539V
[26] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1093/mnras/stw641
[27] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PhRvD..94b2001A
[28] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823L..34A
[29] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv150904283B
[30] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.4099B
[31] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PhRvD..94b2002B
[32] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1093/mnras/stw861
[33] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...826L..29C
[34] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.4301C
[35] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151...39G
[36] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.456.3213G
[37] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.3367G
[38] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1093/mnras/stw990
[39] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1093/mnras/stw2070
[40] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459...21K
[41] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1093/mnras/stw302
[42] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817..135L
[43] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151..157L
[44] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A%26C....16...99M
[45] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...51N
[46] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1093/mnras/stw2062
[47] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461..519P
[48] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.1431R
[49] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..224....1R
[50] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823L..33S
[51] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.3172S
[52] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457..786S
[53] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818L...8S
[54] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...816...98Z