Publications based on DECam data (2018)

Community papers:

• Bhandari et al. (2018), MNRAS, 475, 1427: The SUrvey for Pulsars and Extragalactic Radio Bursts - II. New FRB discoveries and their follow-up
• Butler et al (2018), A&A, 620, A3: The XXL Survey. XVIII. ATCA 2.1 GHz radio source catalogue and source counts for the XXL-South field
• Butler et al (2018), A&A, 620, A16: The XXL Survey. XXXI. Classification and host galaxy properties of 2.1 GHz ATCA XXL-S radio sources
• Carballo-Bello et al. (2018), MNRAS, 474, 683: Tails and streams around the Galactic globular clusters NGC 1851, NGC 1904, NGC 2298 and NGC 2808
• Chandler et al. (2018), PASP, 130, 114502: SAFARI: Searching Asteroids for Activity Revealing Indicators
• Chiappetti et al. (2018), Astronomy & Astrophyscis: The XXL Survey: XXVII. The 3XLSS point source catalogue
• Choi et al. (2018), ApJ, 869, 125: SMASHing the LMC: Mapping a Ring-like Stellar Overdensity in the LMC Disk
• Choi et al (2018), Apj, 866, 90: SMASHing the LMC: A Tidally Induced Warp in the Outer LMC and a Large-scale Reddening Map
• Circuendez et al. (2018), A&A, 609, 53: Tracing the stellar component of low surface brightness Milky Way dwarf galaxies to their outskirts. I. Sextans
• Circuendez & Battaglia, MNRAS, 480, 251: Appearances can be deceiving: clear signs of accretion in the seemingly ordinary Sextans dSph
• Cowperthwaite et al. (2018), ApJ, 858, 18: An Empirical Study of Contamination in Deep, Rapid, and Wide-field Optical Follow-up of Gravitational Wave Events
• Dhawan et al. (2018), MNRAS 480, 1445: iPTF16abc and the population of Type Ia supernovae: comparing the photospheric, transitional, and nebular phases
• Eigenthaler et al. (2018), ApJ, 855, 142: The Next Generation Fornax Survey (NGFS). II. The Central Dwarf Galaxy Population
• Favole et al. (2018), MNRAS, 480, 1415: The mass-size relation of luminous red galaxies from BOSS and DECaLS
• Forster et al. (2018), Nature Astronomy, in press: The delay of shock breakout due to circumstellar material evident in most type II supernovae
• Gao et al. (2018), ApJ, 869, 15: Mass-Metallicity Relation and Fundamental Metallicity Relation of Metal-poor Star-forming Galaxies at 0.6 < Z < 0.9 from the eBOSS Survey
• Garling et al. (2018), ApJ, 852, 44: Mapping the Tidal Destruction of the Hercules Dwarf: A Wide-field DECam Imaging Search for RR Lyrae Stars
• Gonzalez et al. (2018), Astronomy & Computing, 25, 103: Galaxy detection and identification using deep learning and data augmentation
• Holman et al. (2018), ApJ, 855, L6: A Dwarf Planet Class Object in the 21:5 Resonance with Neptune
• Hood et al. (2018), ApJ, 857, 144: The Origin of Faint Tidal Features around Galaxies in the RESOLVE Survey
• Jethwa et al. (2018), MNRAS, 480, 5342: Discovery of a thin stellar stream in the SLAMS survey
• Kerzendorf et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 192: A search for a surviving companion in SN 1006
• Koposov et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 5343: Snake in the Clouds: a new nearby dwarf galaxy in the Magellanic bridge
• Kuzma et al. (2018), MNRAS, 473, 2881: The outer envelopes of globular clusters. II. NGC 1851, NGC 5824 and NGC 1261
• Lan et al (2018), ApJ, 866, 36: The Circumgalactic Medium of eBOSS Emission Line Galaxies: Signatures of Galactic Outflows in Gas Distribution and Kinematics
• Li et al. (2018), ApJ, 861, 6: The Ensemble Photometric Variability of Over 10^5 Quasars in the Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• Mackey et al. (2018), ApJL, 858, L21: Substructures and Tidal Distortions in the Magellanic Stellar Periphery
• Martinez-Palomera (2018), AJ, 156, 186: The High Cadence Transit Survey (HiTS): Compilation and Characterization of Light-curve Catalogs
• Medina et al. (2018), ApJ, 855, 43: Discovery of Distant RR Lyrae Stars in the Milky Way Using DECam
• Minniti et al. (2018), ApJ, 866, 12: Confirmation of a New Metal-poor Globular Cluster in the Galactic Bulge
• Muñoz et al. (2018), ApJ, 860, 65: A MegaCam Survey of Outer Halo Satellites. I. Description of the Survey
• Muñoz et al. (2018), ApJ, 860, 66: A MegaCam Survey of Outer Halo Satellites. III. Photometric and Structural Parameters
• Nidever et al. (2018), AJ, 156, 131: First Data Release of the All-sky NOAO Source Catalog
• Ordenes-Briceño et al. (2018), ApJ, 859, 52: The Next Generation Fornax Survey (NGFS). III. Revealing the Spatial Substructure of the Dwarf Galaxy Population Inside Half of Fornax's Virial Radius
• Ordenes-Briceño et al. (2018), ApJ, 860, 4: The Next Generation Fornax Survey (NGFS). IV. Mass and Age Bimodality of Nuclear Clusters in the Fornax Core Region
• Peña et al. (2018), AJ, 155, 135: Asteroids in the High Cadence Transient Survey
• Piatti et al. (2018), MNRAS, 473, 105: Star cluster formation history along the minor axis of the Large Magellanic Cloud
• Piatti & Mackey (2018), MNRAS, 478, 2164: Evidence of differential tidal effects in the old globular cluster population of the Large Magellanic Cloud
• Plionis et al. (2018), A&A, 620, A17: The XXL Survey. XXXII. Spatial clustering of the XXL-S AGN
• Pota et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 1744: The Fornax Cluster VLT Spectroscopic Survey - I. VIMOS spectroscopy of compact stellar systems in the Fornax core region
• Ramirez-Moreta et al. (2018), A&A, 619, A163: Unveiling the environment and faint features of the isolated galaxy CIG 96 with deep optical and HI observations
• Ross et al. (2018), MNRAS, in press: A new physical interpretation of optical and infrared variability in quasars
• Schlafly et al. (2018), ApJSS, 234, 39: The DECam Plane Survey: Optical Photometry of Two Billion Objects in the Southern Galactic Plane
• Smith et al. (2018), MNRAS, 480, 1466: Light echoes from the plateau in Eta Carinae's Great Eruption reveal a two-stage shock-powered event
• Stevans et al. (2018), ApJ, 863, 63: Bridging Star-forming Galaxy and AGN Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions at z = 4 with the SHELA Wide-field Survey
• Taylor et al (2018), ApJL, 867, L15: A Collection of New Dwarf Galaxies in NGC 5128’s Western Halo
• Torrealba et al. (2018), MNRAS, 475, 5085: Discovery of two neighbouring satellites in the Carina constellation with MagLiteS

Dark Energy Survey Collaboration papers:

• Abbott et al. (2018), MNRAS, in press: Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Estimate from DES Y1, BAO, and D/H Data
• Abbott et al. (2018), ApJS, 239, 18: The Dark Energy Survey: Data Release 1
• Abbott et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 043526: Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
• Agnello et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 4345: DES meets Gaia: discovery of strongly lensed quasars from a multiplet search
• Anguita et al. (2018), MNRAS, in press: The STRong lensing Insights into the Dark Energy Survey (STRIDES) 2016 follow-up campaign. II. New quasar lenses from double component fitting
• Avila et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 94: Dark Energy Survey Year-1 results: galaxy mock catalogues for BAO
• Baxter et al. (2018), MNRAS, 476, 2674: A measurement of CMB cluster lensing with SPT and DES year 1 data
• Becker et al. (2018), AJ, 156, 81: Discovery and Dynamical Analysis of an Extreme Trans-Neptunian Object with a High Orbital Inclination
• Bernstein et al. (2018), PASP, 130, 054501: Photometric Characterization of the Dark Energy Camera
• Burke et al. (2018), AJ, 155, 41: Forward Global Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey
• Cawthon et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 2427: Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: calibration of redMaGiC redshift distributions in DES and SDSS from cross-correlations
• Chan et al. (2018), MNRAS, 480, 3031: BAO from angular clustering: optimization and mitigation of theoretical systematics
• Chang et al. (2018), MNRAS, 475, 3165: Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: curved-sky weak lensing mass map
• Chang et al. (2018), ApJ, 864, 83: The Splashback Feature around DES Galaxy Clusters: Galaxy Density and Weak Lensing Profiles
• Chiu et al. (2018), MNRAS, 478, 3072: Baryon content in a sample of 91 galaxy clusters selected by the South Pole Telescope at 0.2 <z < 1.25
• Courbin et al. (2018), A&A, 609, 71: COSMOGRAIL: the COSmological MOnitoring of GRAvItational Lenses. XVI. Time delays for the quadruply imaged quasar DES J0408-5354 with high-cadence photometric monitoring
• Davis et al. (2018), MNRAS, 477, 2196: Cross-correlation redshift calibration without spectroscopic calibration samples in DES Science Verification Data
• Drlica-Wagner et al. (2108), ApJS, 235, 33: Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
• Elvin-Poole et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 042006: Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
• Erkal et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 3148: Modelling the Tucana III stream - a close passage with the LMC
• Fausti Neto et al. (2018), Astronomy & Computing, 24, 52: DES science portal: Creating science-ready catalogs
• Friedrich et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 023508: Density split statistics: Joint model of counts and lensing in cells
• Garcia-Fernandez et al. (2018), MNRAS, 476, 1071: Weak lensing magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• Gatti et al. (2018), MNRAS, 477, 1664: Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: cross-correlation redshifts - methods and systematics characterization
• Gruen et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 023507: Density split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS data
• Gschwend et al. (2018), Astronomy & Computing, 25, 58: DES science portal: Computing photometric redshifts
• Hoyle et al. (2108), MNRAS, 478, 592: Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: redshift distributions of the weak-lensing source galaxies
• Jeffrey et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 2871: Improving weak lensing mass map reconstructions using Gaussian and sparsity priors: application to DES SV
• Klein et al. (2018), MNRAS, 474, 3324: A multicomponent matched filter cluster confirmation tool for eROSITA: initial application to the RASS and DES-SV data sets
• Khain et al. (2018), AJ, 156, 273: Dynamical Analysis of Three Distant Trans-Neptunian Objects with Similar Orbits
• Li et al. (2018), ApJ, 866, 22: The First Tidally Disrupted Ultra-faint Dwarf Galaxy?: A Spectroscopic Analysis of the Tucana III Stream
• Luque et al. (2018), MNRAS, 478, 2006: Deep SOAR follow-up photometry of two Milky Way outer-halo companions discovered with Dark Energy Survey
• MacCrann et al. (2018), MNRAS, in press: DES Y1 Results: Validating cosmological parameter estimation using simulated Dark Energy Surveys
• Morganson et al. (2018), PASP, 130, 074501: The Dark Energy Survey Image Processing Pipeline
• Mudd et al. (2018), ApJ, 862, 123: Quasar Accretion Disk Sizes from Continuum Reverberation Mapping from the Dark Energy Survey
• Nagasawa et al. (2018), ApJ, 852, 99: Chemical Abundance Analysis of Three alpha-poor, Metal-poor Stars in the Ultrafaint Dwarf Galaxy Horologium I
• Prat et al. (2018), MNRAS, 473, 1667: Galaxy bias from galaxy-galaxy lensing in the DES science verification data
• Prat et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 042005: Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy-galaxy lensing
• Pursiainen et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 849: Rapidly evolving transients in the Dark Energy Survey
• Rumbaugh et al. (2018), MNRAS, 473, 1667: Extreme Variability Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Dark Energy Survey
• Samuroff et al. (2018), MNRAS, 475, 4524: Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: the impact of galaxy neighbours on weak lensing cosmology with IM3SHAPE
• Sevilla-Noarbe et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 5451: Star-galaxy classification in the Dark Energy Survey Y1 data set
• Shipp et al. (2018), ApJ, 862, 114: Stellar Streams Discovered in the Dark Energy Survey
• Smith et al. (2018), ApJ, 854, 37: Studying the Ultraviolet Spectrum of the First Spectroscopically Confirmed Supernova at Redshift Two
• Tarsitano et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 2018: A catalogue of Structural And Morphological Measurements for DES Y1
• Treu et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 1041: The STRong lensing Insights into the Dark Energy Survey (STRIDES) 2016 follow-up campaign - I. Overview and classification of candidates selected by two techniques
• Troxel et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 043528: Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
• Troxel et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 4998: Survey geometry and the internal consistency of recent cosmic shear measurements
• Wethers et al. (2018), MNRAS, 475, 3682: UV-luminous, star-forming hosts of z~2 reddened quasars in the Dark Energy Survey
• Zuntz et al. (2019), MNRAS, 481, 1149: Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing shape catalogues